These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears? Voss SE; Herrmann BS Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones. Schmuziger N; Probst R; Smurzynski J Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15064657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Etymotic insert and TDH supra-aural earphones in auditory brainstem response measurement. Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Hall JW; Peek BF J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 1421467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of insert earphones for high-frequency bedside ototoxicity monitoring. Gordon JS; Phillips DS; Helt WJ; Konrad-Martin D; Fausti SA J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16187247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5. Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone. Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry. Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-frequency audiometry using precision earphones: reliability under laboratory and field conditions. Ising H; Babisch W; Dziombowski D; von Arentsschild O; Fischer R Audiology; 1986; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 3954679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of conductive hearing loss on the masking-level difference: insert versus standard earphones. Hall JW; Grose JH J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2652-7. PubMed ID: 8207138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Extended high-frequency audiometry--reproducibility of two type of earphones]. Schmuziger N; Gantenbein M; Smurzynski J; Bertoli S; Probst R Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000; Suppl 125():75S-76S. PubMed ID: 11141946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes. Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reference threshold sound-pressure levels for the TDH-50 and ER-3A earphones. Larson VD; Cooper WA; Talbott RE; Schwartz DM; Ahlstrom C; De Chicchis AR J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 3411054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of earphones for 12- to 24-month-old children during visual reinforcement audiometry. Weiss AD; Karzon RK; Ead B; Lieu JE Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 26903087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intersubject variability of real-ear sound pressure level: conventional and insert earphones. Valente M; Potts LG; Valente M; Vass W; Goebel J J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Nov; 5(6):390-8. PubMed ID: 7858300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the type of acoustic transducer in pure-tone audiometry. Born NM; Marciano MDS; Mass SDC; Silva DPCD; Scharlach RC Codas; 2022; 34(3):e20210019. PubMed ID: 35019084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]