These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1487107)

  • 1. Attenuation values for a supra-aural earphone for children and insert earphone for children and adults.
    Wright DC; Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):454-9. PubMed ID: 1487107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attenuation provided by four different audiometric earphone systems.
    Frank T; Wright DC
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 2307308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing thresholds, threshold repeatability, and attenuation values for passive noise-reducing earphone enclosures.
    Frank T; Greer AC; Magistro DM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Nov; 58(11):772-8. PubMed ID: 9373922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Etymotic insert and TDH supra-aural earphones in auditory brainstem response measurement.
    Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Hall JW; Peek BF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 1421467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reference threshold levels for an ER-3A insert earphone.
    Frank T; Vavrek MJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jan; 3(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 1571587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three studies comparing performance of the ER-3A tubephone with the TDH-50P earphone.
    Clark JL; Roeser RJ
    Ear Hear; 1988 Oct; 9(5):268-74. PubMed ID: 3224775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interaural attenuation for tubephone insert earphones.
    Sklare DA; Denenberg LJ
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):298-300. PubMed ID: 3678645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference threshold sound-pressure levels for the TDH-50 and ER-3A earphones.
    Larson VD; Cooper WA; Talbott RE; Schwartz DM; Ahlstrom C; De Chicchis AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 3411054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
    Lindgren F
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Margolis RH; Saly GL; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 35817024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of earphones for 12- to 24-month-old children during visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Weiss AD; Karzon RK; Ead B; Lieu JE
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 26903087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical use of an insert earphone.
    Clemis JD; Ballad WJ; Killion MC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):520-4. PubMed ID: 3767222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Shera CA; Peake WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65. PubMed ID: 10738809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.