These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Supporting whistleblowers in academic medicine: training and respecting the courage of professional conscience. Faunce T; Bolsin S; Chan WP J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 14872070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics? Baylis F J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):44-9; discussion 50-2. PubMed ID: 14872072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex Affair in Toronto. Ferris LE; Singer PA; Naylor CD J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 14872067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research. Garte SJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Jan; 1(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 11657881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB. Hilgartner S IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Canadian whistleblower row prompts broader code of conduct. Spurgeon D Nature; 1998 Dec 24-31; 396(6713):715. PubMed ID: 9874365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Why fallout from whistleblowing is hard to avoid. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson). Sieber JE Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 11657863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest. Cohen P New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating research misconduct policies at major research universities: a pilot study. Lind RA Account Res; 2005; 12(3):241-62. PubMed ID: 16634174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protecting research integrity. Hansson MG Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 11273441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. University forced to pay $1.6 million to researcher. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1997 Aug; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Walter C. Randall Lecture on Biomedical Ethics: Colleagues as a defense against bad science. Koocher GP Physiologist; 2012 Apr; 55(2):52-6. PubMed ID: 22662570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. No One Likes a Snitch. Redman B; Caplan A Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):813-9. PubMed ID: 24935246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Academics face abuse of rules designed to protect research. Cowen RC Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Mar; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research misconduct: time for a re-think? Breen KJ Intern Med J; 2016 Jun; 46(6):728-33. PubMed ID: 27257149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Encouraging and Rewarding the Whistleblower in Research Misconduct Cases. Freckelton I J Law Med; 2019 Jul; 26(4):719-731. PubMed ID: 31682351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research integrity in China: problems and prospects. Zeng W; Resnik D Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 19832885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responsible conduct of research: enhancing local opportunities. Mwaka ES Afr Health Sci; 2017 Jun; 17(2):584-590. PubMed ID: 29062357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]