These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14872284)

  • 1. Anatomical considerations regarding the "bare spot" of the glenoid cavity.
    Aigner F; Longato S; Fritsch H; Kralinger F
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Aug; 26(4):308-11. PubMed ID: 14872284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the bare spot a valid landmark for glenoid evaluation in arthroscopic Bankart surgery?
    Saintmard B; Lecouvet F; Rubini A; Dubuc JE
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Dec; 75(6):736-42. PubMed ID: 20166354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study.
    Huysmans PE; Haen PS; Kidd M; Dhert WJ; Willems JW
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2006; 15(6):759-63. PubMed ID: 16990019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity.
    De Wilde LF; Berghs BM; Audenaert E; Sys G; Van Maele GO; Barbaix E
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Feb; 26(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 14504818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the bare spot a consistent landmark for shoulder arthroscopy? A study of 20 embalmed glenoids with 3-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction.
    Kralinger F; Aigner F; Longato S; Rieger M; Wambacher M
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 16581456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of anterior glenoid bone loss area using the ratio of bone defect length to the distance from posterior glenoid rim to the centre of the glenoid.
    Shin SJ; Jun BJ; Koh YW; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jan; 26(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 27671285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability.
    Burkhart SS; Debeer JF; Tehrany AM; Parten PM
    Arthroscopy; 2002; 18(5):488-91. PubMed ID: 11987058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of arthroscopic measurement of glenoid bone loss using the bare spot.
    Miyatake K; Takeda Y; Fujii K; Takasago T; Iwame T
    Open Access J Sports Med; 2014; 5():37-42. PubMed ID: 24744612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of glenoid bone loss: a comparison of measurement error between 45 degrees and 0 degrees bone loss models and with different posterior arthroscopy portal locations.
    Provencher MT; Detterline AJ; Ghodadra N; Romeo AA; Bach BR; Cole BJ; Verma N
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Jun; 36(6):1132-8. PubMed ID: 18354146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arthroscopic bare spot method underestimates true bone defect in bony Bankart lesion.
    Kho J; Kholinne E; Lim S; Hong H; Kwak JM; Sun Y; Koh KH; Jeon IH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 Sep; 139(9):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 31111200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glenoid bare area: arthroscopic characterization and its implications on measurement of bone loss.
    Barcia AM; Rowles DJ; Bottoni CR; Dekker TJ; Tokish JM
    Arthroscopy; 2013 Oct; 29(10):1671-5. PubMed ID: 23993146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pillars of the scapula.
    Karelse A; Kegels L; De Wilde L
    Clin Anat; 2007 May; 20(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 17072866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative analysis of attachment of the labrum to the glenoid fossa: a cadaveric study.
    Yoshida M; Goto H; Nozaki M; Nishimori Y; Takenaga T; Murase A; Nagaya Y; Iguchi H; Kobayashi M; Sugimoto K; Nishiyama T; Otsuka T
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Sep; 20(5):823-9. PubMed ID: 26169109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new arthroscopic technique to determine anterior-inferior glenoid bone loss: validation of the secant chord theory in a cadaveric model.
    Detterline AJ; Provencher MT; Ghodadra N; Bach BR; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1249-56. PubMed ID: 19896046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relation of the coracoid process to the glenoid: an anatomic study.
    Tham A; Purchase R; Kelly JD
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Aug; 25(8):846-8. PubMed ID: 19664503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple method of glenoid bone loss calculation using ipsilateral magnetic resonance imaging.
    Owens BD; Burns TC; Campbell SE; Svoboda SJ; Cameron KL
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Mar; 41(3):622-4. PubMed ID: 23339835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR imaging in the evaluation of SLAP injuries of the shoulder: findings in 10 patients.
    Cartland JP; Crues JV; Stauffer A; Nottage W; Ryu RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):787-92. PubMed ID: 1529844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High correlation between inner and outer glenoid circle diameters and its clinical relevance.
    Arenas-Miquelez A; Karargyris O; Graham PL; Hertel R
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Jan; 31(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 35809103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The glenoid center point: a magnetic resonance imaging study of normal scapular anatomy.
    Meyer NJ; Pennington WT; Ziegler DW
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Apr; 36(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 17515186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the Bare Spot reliable for the bone loss measurement?
    Ramos MRF; San Junior YAC; Alves LHP; Cruz FC; Mansur H
    Shoulder Elbow; 2019 Apr; 11(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 30936949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.