108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1487280)
1. Field distributions in the rat tibia with and without a porous implant during electrical stimulation: a parametric modeling.
Ducheyne P; Ellis LY; Pollack SR; Pienkowski D; Cuckler JM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Nov; 39(11):1168-78. PubMed ID: 1487280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of pulsing electromagnetic field on bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant.
Ijiri K; Matsunaga S; Fukuyama K; Maeda S; Sakou T; Kitano M; Senba I
Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(5A):2853-6. PubMed ID: 8917397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical field effect on peri-implant osteogenesis: a histologic and histomorphometric study.
Giannunzio GA; Speerli RC; Guglielmotti MB
Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 18332765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm.
Liu X; Niebur GL
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Aug; 7(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 17701434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A double-blind study on the effects of a capacitively coupled electrical field on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced canine total hip prostheses.
Schutzer SF; Jasty M; Bragdon CR; Harrigan TP; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Nov; (260):297-304. PubMed ID: 2225636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Amelioration of oxygen-induced osteoporosis in the in vitro fetal rat tibia with a capacitively coupled electrical field.
Brighton CT; Nichols CE; Arangio GA
J Orthop Res; 1985; 3(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 2411895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a rat tibia model for morphological studies of the interface between bone and a titanium implant.
Clokie CM; Warshawsky H
Compendium; 1995 Jan; 16(1):56, 58, 60 passim; quiz 68. PubMed ID: 7758041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of pores created by laser superfinishing on osseointegration of titanium alloy implants.
Stangl R; Pries A; Loos B; Müller M; Erben RG
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):444-53. PubMed ID: 15127391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains.
Simmons CA; Meguid SA; Pilliar RM
J Orthop Res; 2001 Mar; 19(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 11347689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant.
Qin YX; McLeod KJ; Guilak F; Chiang FP; Rubin CT
J Orthop Res; 1996 Nov; 14(6):862-70. PubMed ID: 8982127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Field distributions in vertebral bodies of the rat during electrical stimulation: a parametric study.
Carter EL; Vresilovic EJ; Pollack SR; Brighton CT
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1989 Mar; 36(3):333-45. PubMed ID: 2784127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current density in a model of a human body with a conductive implant exposed to ELF electric and magnetic fields.
Valic B; Gajsek P; Miklavcic D
Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Oct; 30(7):591-9. PubMed ID: 19418511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants.
Otsuki B; Takemoto M; Fujibayashi S; Neo M; Kokubo T; Nakamura T
Biomaterials; 2006 Dec; 27(35):5892-900. PubMed ID: 16945409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of electrodischarged prototype implants in rabbit tibia: a preliminary study.
Dominici JT; Sammon PJ; Drummond JF; Lifland MI; Geissler R; Okazaki K
J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 7643439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A light and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of electro-discharge-compacted porous titanium implants in rabbit tibia.
Drummond JF; Dominici JT; Sammon PJ; Okazaki K; Geissler R; Lifland MI; Anderson SA; Renshaw W
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 8699522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osteointegration of hydroxyapatite-titanium implants coated with nonglycosylated recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in aged sheep.
Sachse A; Wagner A; Keller M; Wagner O; Wetzel WD; Layher F; Venbrocks RA; Hortschansky P; Pietraszczyk M; Wiederanders B; Hempel HJ; Bossert J; Horn J; Schmuck K; Mollenhauer J
Bone; 2005 Nov; 37(5):699-710. PubMed ID: 16139577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants.
Susin C; Qahash M; Hall J; Sennerby L; Wikesjö UM
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 35(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 18269667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell and matrix reactions at titanium implants in surgically prepared rat tibiae.
Masuda T; Salvi GE; Offenbacher S; Felton DA; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):472-85. PubMed ID: 9274076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
