These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1488243)

  • 1. Evoked otoacoustic emission: behaviour under the forward masking paradigm.
    Kevanishvili Z; Gobsch H; Gvelesiani T; Gamgebeli Z
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 1488243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Behaviour of delayed evoked otoacoustic emission under forward masking paradigm.
    Gobsch H; Kevanishvili Z; Gamgebeli Z; Gvelesiani T
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 1439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Forward masking of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Sawaki M; Hattori T; Niwa H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1994 Apr; 97(4):688-95. PubMed ID: 8189318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of masker component phase on the forward masking produced by complex tones in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC; Stainsby TH; Tarasewicz E
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15157967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relation between otoacoustic emissions and the broadening of the auditory filter for higher levels.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 126(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 9872128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Williams EJ; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The psychoacoustic phenomenon of masking level differences in the human subject studied by auditory evoked potentials].
    Kevanishvili ZSh; Lagidze ZP
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1988; 38(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 3400318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination of rippled-spectrum patterns in noise: A manifestation of compressive nonlinearity.
    Milekhina ON; Nechaev DI; Klishin VO; Supin AY
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174685. PubMed ID: 28346538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold.
    Garinis A; Werner L; Abdala C
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 21878379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise.
    Nechaev DI; Milekhina ON; Supin AY
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140313. PubMed ID: 26462066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of temporal separation and masker level on binaural analysis in forward masking.
    Yama MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):327-35. PubMed ID: 1737881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.
    Rodríguez J; Neely ST; Patra H; Kopun J; Jesteadt W; Tan H; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):361-9. PubMed ID: 20058983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of broadband elicitor duration on a psychoacoustic measure of cochlear gain reduction.
    Salloom WB; Bharadwaj H; Strickland EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Apr; 153(4):2482. PubMed ID: 37092950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.
    Mehraei G; Gallardo AP; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 346():34-44. PubMed ID: 28159652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions and detection of a multi-tone complex in noise.
    Micheyl C; Morlet T; Giraud AL; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1995 Mar; 115(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 7610799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a precursor on growth of forward masking.
    Krull V; Strickland EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4352-7. PubMed ID: 18537386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43. PubMed ID: 25786946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.