These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1489232)

  • 21. Back to basics: an introduction to statistics.
    Halfens RJ; Meijers JM
    J Wound Care; 2013 May; 22(5):248-51. PubMed ID: 23702722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How do we draw inference from "negative" studies?
    Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 12514684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Check your confidence: size really does matter.
    Carlson HA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1837-41. PubMed ID: 23909878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Informative simultaneous confidence intervals for the fallback procedure.
    Schmidt S; Brannath W
    Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):712-9. PubMed ID: 25951332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Explorations in statistics: standard deviations and standard errors.
    Curran-Everett D
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2008 Sep; 32(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 18794241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters.
    Agresti A; Bini M; Bertaccini B; Ryu E
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1270-5. PubMed ID: 18266891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing apples and oranges.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Jan; 123(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11782750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The merits of confidence intervals relative to hypothesis testing.
    Birnbaum D; Sheps SB
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1992 Sep; 13(9):553-5. PubMed ID: 1431004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do CIs give you confidence?
    Norman GR; Streiner DL
    Chest; 2012 Jan; 141(1):17-19. PubMed ID: 22215826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sample size determination: extended tables for the multiplicative model and bioequivalence ranges of 0.9 to 1.11 and 0.7 to 1.43.
    Diletti E; Hauschke D; Steinijans VW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992 Aug; 30(8):287-90. PubMed ID: 1526691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A practical approach for comparing means of two groups without equal variance assumption.
    Wang H; Chow SC
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3137-51. PubMed ID: 12369087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [What is p and why calculated at 0.05?].
    Beck-Bornholdt HP; Dubben HH
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1999 Apr; 175 Suppl 1():3-4. PubMed ID: 10230448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Descriptive statistics.
    Pérez-Vicente S; Expósito Ruiz M
    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2009; 37(6):314-20. PubMed ID: 19945776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical significance, power and sample size--Part 2.
    Christley RM
    J Small Anim Pract; 2008 Jul; 49(7):321-2. PubMed ID: 18638056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The empirical coverage of confidence intervals: point estimates and confidence intervals for confidence levels.
    Schall R
    Biom J; 2012 Jul; 54(4):537-51. PubMed ID: 22623325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance. Part II. The use and interpretation of confidence intervals.
    Luus HG; Müller FO; Meyer BH
    S Afr Med J; 1989 Dec; 76(11):626-9. PubMed ID: 2595492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [What is the therapeutic effect if a patient gets better but nobody knows how much? Analysis of change when the data material consists of ordered categories].
    Svensson E
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Oct 24-30; 102(43):3138-42, 3145. PubMed ID: 16302509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistics notebook: entry III.G: power of a test.
    De Land PN; Chase WW
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Feb; 69(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 1584557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing survival of a sample to that of a standard population.
    Finkelstein DM; Muzikansky A; Schoenfeld DA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Oct; 95(19):1434-9. PubMed ID: 14519749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods.
    Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.