These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1489512)

  • 1. Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool.
    Bates-Jensen BM; Vredevoe DL; Brecht ML
    Decubitus; 1992 Nov; 5(6):20-8. PubMed ID: 1489512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Pressure Sore Status Tool a few thousand assessments later.
    Bates-Jensen BM
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):65-73. PubMed ID: 9362584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward an intelligent wound assessment system.
    Bates-Jensen BM; McNees P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Aug; 41(7A Suppl):80S-86S; discussion 87S. PubMed ID: 7669204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
    Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.
    Bergstrom N; Braden BJ; Laguzza A; Holman V
    Nurs Res; 1987; 36(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 3299278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.
    Vanderwee K; Grypdonck MH; De Bacquer D; Defloor T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2006 Aug; 19(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 16877195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure ulcer assessment instruments: a critical appraisal.
    Woodbury MG; Houghton PE; Campbell KE; Keast DH
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 May; 45(5):42-5, 48-50, 53-5. PubMed ID: 10647473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.
    Defloor T; Schoonhoven L; Katrien V; Weststrate J; Myny D
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 16553705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient dependency in the emergency department (ED): reliability and validity of the Jones Dependency Tool (JDT).
    Crouch R; Williams S
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 2006 Oct; 14(4):219-29. PubMed ID: 16904323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-rater reliability of risk-assessment scales.
    Watkinson C
    Prof Nurse; 1996 Aug; 11(11):751-2, 755-6. PubMed ID: 8718321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity and reliability of medical and surgical oncology patient acuity tools.
    Lovett RB; Reardon MB; Gordon BK; McMillan S
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1994; 21(10):1709-17. PubMed ID: 7854933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical validation of pressure ulcer risk factors.
    Sparks SM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993 May; 39(4):40-1, 43-6, 48. PubMed ID: 8363717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of the Knoll Assessment Scale in a tertiary care facility.
    Aronovitch S; Millenbach L; Kelman GB; Wing P
    Decubitus; 1992 May; 5(3):70-2, 74-6. PubMed ID: 1596355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing.
    Sanada H; Moriguchi T; Miyachi Y; Ohura T; Nakajo T; Tokunaga K; Fukui M; Sugama J; Kitagawa A
    J Wound Care; 2004 Jan; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 14969021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing a pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for patients in long-term care.
    Lepisto M; Eriksson E; Hietanen H; Lepisto J; Lauri S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):34-46. PubMed ID: 16464993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and reliability of an oral care practice survey for the orally intubated adult critically ill patient.
    Feider LL; Mitchell P
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(5):374-7. PubMed ID: 19680163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.