168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1489512)
1. Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool.
Bates-Jensen BM; Vredevoe DL; Brecht ML
Decubitus; 1992 Nov; 5(6):20-8. PubMed ID: 1489512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Pressure Sore Status Tool a few thousand assessments later.
Bates-Jensen BM
Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):65-73. PubMed ID: 9362584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward an intelligent wound assessment system.
Bates-Jensen BM; McNees P
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Aug; 41(7A Suppl):80S-86S; discussion 87S. PubMed ID: 7669204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.
Bergstrom N; Braden BJ; Laguzza A; Holman V
Nurs Res; 1987; 36(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 3299278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.
Vanderwee K; Grypdonck MH; De Bacquer D; Defloor T
Appl Nurs Res; 2006 Aug; 19(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 16877195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pressure ulcer assessment instruments: a critical appraisal.
Woodbury MG; Houghton PE; Campbell KE; Keast DH
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 May; 45(5):42-5, 48-50, 53-5. PubMed ID: 10647473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.
Defloor T; Schoonhoven L; Katrien V; Weststrate J; Myny D
J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 16553705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient dependency in the emergency department (ED): reliability and validity of the Jones Dependency Tool (JDT).
Crouch R; Williams S
Accid Emerg Nurs; 2006 Oct; 14(4):219-29. PubMed ID: 16904323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-rater reliability of risk-assessment scales.
Watkinson C
Prof Nurse; 1996 Aug; 11(11):751-2, 755-6. PubMed ID: 8718321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of medical and surgical oncology patient acuity tools.
Lovett RB; Reardon MB; Gordon BK; McMillan S
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1994; 21(10):1709-17. PubMed ID: 7854933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical validation of pressure ulcer risk factors.
Sparks SM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993 May; 39(4):40-1, 43-6, 48. PubMed ID: 8363717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of the Knoll Assessment Scale in a tertiary care facility.
Aronovitch S; Millenbach L; Kelman GB; Wing P
Decubitus; 1992 May; 5(3):70-2, 74-6. PubMed ID: 1596355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing.
Sanada H; Moriguchi T; Miyachi Y; Ohura T; Nakajo T; Tokunaga K; Fukui M; Sugama J; Kitagawa A
J Wound Care; 2004 Jan; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 14969021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing a pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for patients in long-term care.
Lepisto M; Eriksson E; Hietanen H; Lepisto J; Lauri S
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):34-46. PubMed ID: 16464993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of an oral care practice survey for the orally intubated adult critically ill patient.
Feider LL; Mitchell P
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(5):374-7. PubMed ID: 19680163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
