These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1490036)

  • 1. Impairment evaluation based on spinal range of motion in normal subjects.
    Lowery WD; Horn TJ; Boden SD; Wiesel SW
    J Spinal Disord; 1992 Dec; 5(4):398-402. PubMed ID: 1490036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of the American Medical Association guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating.
    Nitschke JE; Nattrass CL; Disler PB; Chou MJ; Ooi KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 10025021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The prevalence and severity of lumbar spine motion impairment in normal subjects.
    Striplin MR; Beach DJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E115-6. PubMed ID: 22652991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
    Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lumbar spine range of motion as a measure of physical and functional impairment: an investigation of validity.
    Nattrass CL; Nitschke JE; Disler PB; Chou MJ; Ooi KT
    Clin Rehabil; 1999 Jun; 13(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 10392648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary on the American Medical Association guides' lumbar impairment validity checks.
    Zuberbier OA; Hunt DG; Kozlowski AJ; Berkowitz J; Schultz IZ; Crook JM; Milner RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(24):2735-7. PubMed ID: 11740365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of age and gender on lumbar spine sagittal plane range of motion. A study of 1126 healthy subjects.
    Sullivan MS; Dickinson CE; Troup JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Mar; 19(6):682-6. PubMed ID: 8009333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normal functional range of motion of the cervical spine during 15 activities of daily living.
    Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb; 23(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20051924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A database for estimating normal spinal motion derived from noninvasive measurements.
    Gracovetsky S; Newman N; Pawlowsky M; Lanzo V; Davey B; Robinson L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 May; 20(9):1036-46. PubMed ID: 7631233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Korean guideline development for the evaluation of permanent impairment of the spine: proposal by the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Committee.
    Kim YB; Lee SG; Park CW; Kim DJ; Park YK; Sung NJ; Ahn SH; Ahn JS; Shin HS; Lee BS; Kim JH; Jeon CH;
    J Korean Med Sci; 2009 May; 24 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S307-13. PubMed ID: 19503688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of normal lumbar flexion with surface inclinometry. A comparison of three methods.
    Rondinelli R; Murphy J; Esler A; Marciano T; Cholmakjian C
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Aug; 71(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 1642821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
    Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 20065869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thoracic segmental flexion during cervical forward bending.
    Fiebert IM; Spyropoulos T; Peterman D; Dotson L
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 3(4):80-5. PubMed ID: 24573143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the convergent and discriminant validity of published lumbar flexion, extension, and lateral flexion scores.
    Zuberbier OA; Kozlowski AJ; Hunt DG; Berkowitz J; Schultz IZ; Crook JM; Milner RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(20):E472-8. PubMed ID: 11598527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part I: Lumbar mobility.
    Mayer T; Tabor J; Bovasso E; Gatchel RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Feb; 19(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 8178224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impairment ratings and disability issues of the upper extremity.
    Jones FE
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 8(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 24572712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between the measures of impairment, according to the modified system of the American Medical Association, and function.
    McCarthy ML; McAndrew MP; MacKenzie EJ; Burgess AR; Cushing BM; Delateur BJ; Jurkovich GJ; Morris JA; Swiontkowski MF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Jul; 80(7):1034-42. PubMed ID: 9698008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the spine utilizing the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th edition.
    Haralson RH
    Instr Course Lect; 1999; 48():451-61. PubMed ID: 10098076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination.
    Castro WH; Sautmann A; Schilgen M; Sautmann M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Feb; 25(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 10707389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.