These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1490460)

  • 1. Evaluation of a "universal" digital fluoroscopy unit for GI, interventional and angiography work. A model for future equipment design.
    Fairbrother J; Romeo MA
    Eur J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 15(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 1490460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fluoroscopic imaging computer.
    Longley RL
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Apr; 7(4):48-50. PubMed ID: 10287388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model of a vascular C-arm for 3D augmented fluoroscopy in interventional radiology.
    Gorges S; Kerrien E; Berger MO; Trousset Y; Pescatore J; Anxionnat R; Picard L
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):214-22. PubMed ID: 16685962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Criteria to optimise a dynamic flat detector system used for interventional radiology.
    Simon R; Vano E; Prieto C; Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Martinez D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):261-4. PubMed ID: 18304958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of 120 kilovolt tube potential for digital subtraction angiography and fluoroscopy in an image-intensifier angiographic system: decrease of skin dose in transarterial chemoembolization therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Irie T; Satou R
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(5):901-5. PubMed ID: 17508235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reducing radiation dosage with modern DSA equipment].
    Waggershauser T; Herrmann K; Schätzl M; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 7761589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimize x-ray systems to minimize radiation dose.
    Gray JE
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Oct; 20(10):62-3, 67, 69-70. PubMed ID: 10187442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equipment configuration and procedures: preferences for interventional microtherapy.
    Grönemeyer D; Seibel R; Erbel R; Schmidt A; Melzer A; Plassmann J; Deli M; Schmermund A; Baumgart D; Welsch R; Ge J; Goerge G
    J Digit Imaging; 1996 May; 9(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 8734578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why use remote guidance to steer catheters and guide wires?
    Miller DL
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):313-4. PubMed ID: 15286298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remote-controlled fluoroscopy in a paediatric hospital.
    Gough L
    Can J Med Radiat Technol; 1987 Aug; 18(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 10284100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical imaging equipment matrix. A resource guide for purchasing medical imaging equipment. AHRA Western Region, American Healthcare Radiology Administrators.
    Radiol Manage; 1995; Suppl():5-48. PubMed ID: 10144944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The usefulness of K-edge filters in automatic brightness controlled fluoroscopy and digital subtraction angiography.
    Heggie JC
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1992 Mar; 15(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 1575651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Combined use of real-time digital subtraction radioscopy and computerized tomography: potential advantages in diagnostic and interventional radiology].
    Damascelli B; Frigerio LF; Salvetti M; Marchianò A; Spreafico C; Di Tolla G; Segura C; Rizzo D; Lanocita R; Porcelli G
    Radiol Med; 1992 May; 83(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 1631326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptance testing of fluoroscopy systems used for interventional purposes.
    O'Connor U; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; Walsh C; Larkin A; Gray L; Devine M; Malone J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):56-8. PubMed ID: 18285319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective criteria for acceptability and constancy tests of digital subtraction angiography.
    de las Heras H; Torres R; Fernández-Soto JM; Vañó E
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):272-6. PubMed ID: 26522881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative Angiography Using Portable Fluoroscopy Unit in the Treatment of Vascular Malformation.
    Hayashi K; Horie N; Morofuji Y; Fukuda S; Yamaguchi S; Izumo T
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2015; 55(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 26041625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Display monitors for digital medical imaging.
    Andriole KP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 17411873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital fluoroscopy.
    Pooley RA; McKinney JM; Miller DA
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(2):521-34. PubMed ID: 11259716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital fluoroscopy and radiography system: technical description and clinical examples.
    Cox GG; Templeton AW; McMillan JH; Wetzel LH; Lee KR
    Radiographics; 1990 May; 10(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 2343166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.