These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14907930)

  • 1. Resistance to extinction following periodic reinforcement in the presence of a discriminative stimulus.
    DINSMOOR JA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1952 Feb; 45(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 14907930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partial (periodic) vs. continuous reinforcement in resistance to extinction.
    JENKINS WO; RIGBY MK
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1950 Feb; 43(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 15410046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resistance to extinction when partial reinforcement is followed by regular reinforcement.
    JENKINS HM
    J Exp Psychol; 1962 Nov; 64():441-50. PubMed ID: 13964626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A demonstration of superior resistance to extinction following continuous reinforcement as compared with partial reinforcement.
    RUBIN LS
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1953 Feb; 46(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 13034949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative resistance to extinction of aperiodic and continuous reinforcement separately and in combination.
    LIKELY FA
    J Gen Psychol; 1958 Apr; 58(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 13539355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of partial reinforcement with spaced practice on resistance to extinction in the fish.
    LONGO N; BITTERMAN ME
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1960 Apr; 53():169-72. PubMed ID: 14418167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resistance to extinction and rate of lever-pulling as a function of percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials.
    CARMENT DW; MILES CG
    Can J Psychol; 1962 Jun; 16():145-51. PubMed ID: 13876680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expectation and resistance to extinction of a lever-pulling response as functions of percentage of reinforcement and amount of reward.
    LEWIS DJ; DUNCAN CP
    J Exp Psychol; 1957 Aug; 54(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 13475636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expectation and resistance to extinction of a leverpulling response as a function of percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials.
    LEWIS DJ; DUNCAN CP
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Feb; 55(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 13513924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resistance to extinction as a function of number of shock-termination reinforcements.
    CAMPBELL SL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1959 Dec; 52():754-8. PubMed ID: 13807306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RESISTANCE TO EXTINCTION IN THE RAT AS A FUNCTION OF PERCENTAGE AND DISTRIBUTION OF REINFORCEMENT.
    GONZALEZ RC; BITTERMAN ME
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1964 Oct; 58():258-63. PubMed ID: 14215400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between the discriminative and aversive properties of punishment.
    HOLZ WC; AZRIN NH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Apr; 5(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 13908625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EFFECT OF N-LENGTH, NUMBER OF DIFFERENT N-LENGTHS, AND NUMBER OF REINFORCEMENTS ON RESISTANCE TO EXTINCTION.
    CAPALDI EJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Sep; 68():230-9. PubMed ID: 14215420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extinction effects following nondifferential reinforcement of an irrelevant stimulus.
    SPERLING SE
    J Exp Psychol; 1962 Jan; 63():50-6. PubMed ID: 13915731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training reinforcement rates, resistance to extinction, and the role of context in reinstatement.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Bensemann J; Podlesnik CA
    Learn Behav; 2016 Mar; 44(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 26139290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer across drives of the discriminative effect of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus.
    BOWER G; KAUFMAN R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Jul; 6(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 14014606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extinction following partial reinforcement with control of stimulus-generalization and secondary reinforcement.
    TYLER DW
    Am J Psychol; 1956 Sep; 69(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 13354797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Configurations of the interoceptive discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol and nicotine with two different exteroceptive contexts in rats: Extinction & recovery.
    Troisi JR; Craig EM
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():169-80. PubMed ID: 25895858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus aftereffects and the partial-reinforcement extinction effect.
    KATZ S
    J Exp Psychol; 1957 Mar; 53(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 13416478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extinction learning, reconsolidation and the internal reinforcement hypothesis.
    Eisenhardt D; Menzel R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2007 Feb; 87(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 17079171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.