These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1490902)

  • 1. Frequency selectivity in workers with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Laroche C; Hétu R; Quoc HT; Josserand B; Glasberg B
    Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 64(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 1490902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
    Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment.
    Baker RJ; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1330-9. PubMed ID: 11931310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady-state and auditory brainstem-evoked responses.
    Karawani H; Attias J; Shemesh R; Nageris B
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 40(6):672-81. PubMed ID: 25919036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners.
    Sommers MS; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2903-14. PubMed ID: 8315154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
    Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory filter shapes of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in continuous broadband noise.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3127-37. PubMed ID: 8300951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting hearing thresholds and occupational hearing loss with multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses.
    Hsu RF; Ho CK; Lu SN; Chen SS
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 20828512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise-induced hearing loss induces loudness intolerance in a rat Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP).
    Manohar S; Spoth J; Radziwon K; Auerbach BD; Salvi R
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():197-203. PubMed ID: 28705607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up of hearing thresholds among forge hammering workers.
    Kamal AA; Mikael RA; Faris R
    Am J Ind Med; 1989; 16(6):645-58. PubMed ID: 2596486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiologic characteristics in a sample of recently-separated military Veterans: The Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study (NOISE Study).
    Gordon JS; Griest SE; Thielman EJ; Carlson KF; Helt WJ; Lewis MS; Blankenship C; Austin D; Theodoroff SM; Henry JA
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():21-30. PubMed ID: 27913314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1796-806. PubMed ID: 8817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evoked otoacoustic emissions in noise-induced hearing loss].
    Bicciolo G; Ruscito P; Rizzo S; Frenguelli A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1993; 13(6):505-15. PubMed ID: 8209689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of calibration tolerance values on obtained audiometric threshold: a hearing conservation perspective.
    Woodford CM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Feb; 45(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 6702604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of ipsilateral and contralateral low-frequency narrow-band noise on temporary threshold shift in humans.
    Quaranta A; Scaringi A; Fernandez-Vega S; Quaranta N
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 12701733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporary threshold shifts at 1500 and 2000 Hz induced by loud voice signals communicated through earphones in the pinball industry.
    Idota N; Horie S; Tsutsui T; Inoue J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 20584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Prince MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):557-67. PubMed ID: 12186037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response].
    Mühlenberg L; Schade G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids: effects of frequency and level.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Mar; 93(3):1563-70. PubMed ID: 8473610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.