These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1490904)
1. Effects of envelope fluctuations on gap detection. Glasberg BR; Moore BC Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 64(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 1490904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise. Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI; Launer S; Kuehnel V Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):365-74. PubMed ID: 11848178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comodulation masking release in subjects with unilateral and bilateral hearing impairment. Moore BC; Shailer MJ; Hall JW; Schooneveldt GP J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):435-51. PubMed ID: 8423260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. Moore BC; Glasberg BR J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1093-101. PubMed ID: 3356814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Within- and across-channel gap detection in cochlear implant listeners. Grose JH; Buss E J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3651-8. PubMed ID: 18247772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gap detection as a function of stimulus bandwidth with fixed high-frequency cutoff in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Grose JH; Eddins DA; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Nov; 86(5):1747-55. PubMed ID: 2808923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. Glasberg BR; Moore BC; Bacon SP J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 May; 81(5):1546-56. PubMed ID: 3584692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relation between gap detection, loudness, and loudness growth in noise-masked normal-hearing listeners. Hall JW; Grose JH J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Feb; 101(2):1044-9. PubMed ID: 9035396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. Glasberg BR; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1020-33. PubMed ID: 3700857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing. Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2928-38. PubMed ID: 22087921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203. PubMed ID: 27036255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency. Buss E; Hall JW; Porter H; Grose JH J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):1098-107. PubMed ID: 24686553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43. PubMed ID: 25786946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus. Paul BT; Bruce IC; Roberts LE Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():170-182. PubMed ID: 27888040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech Masking in Normal and Impaired Hearing: Interactions Between Frequency Selectivity and Inherent Temporal Fluctuations in Noise. Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():125-132. PubMed ID: 27080653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies. Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):306-16. PubMed ID: 1737879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection. Hall JW; Buss E; Ozmeral EJ; Grose JH J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1601. PubMed ID: 27106308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech. Moore BC; Glasberg BR J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2050-62. PubMed ID: 8227747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age. Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]