These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1493011)

  • 1. Endocervical sampling devices.
    Balkrishna N
    Br J Gen Pract; 1992 Feb; 42(355):77. PubMed ID: 1493011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G; Graham L; Cannon D; Waters K; Feller D
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sampling endocervical cells on cervical smears: a comparison of two instruments used in general practice. Cumbrian Practice Research Group.
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 May; 41(346):192-3. PubMed ID: 1817471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different sampling devices on the presence of endocervical cells in cervical smears. A systematic literature review.
    Buntinx F; Knottnerus JA; André J; Crebolder HF; Essed GG
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1994 Jan; 3(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8130713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Modified endocervical vaginal smear for diagnosis of endocervical microinvasive cervix carcinoma].
    Melsheimer P; Hahn U; Herberling D; Wallwiener D; Rummel HH; Bastert G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(11):608-10. PubMed ID: 8533497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
    Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
    Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between Cytobrush and Papaplast in sampling vaginal smears.
    Hjersing M; Holm E; Larsson G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(7-8):595-9. PubMed ID: 1785277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?
    Kivlahan C; Ingram E
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 3459326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The significance of endocervical cells in the vaginal smear and a new technic for the collection of endocervical smears].
    Boon ME; Alons van Kordelaar JJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Mar; 130(12):557. PubMed ID: 3960172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
    Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endocervical cells on Pap smears.
    Hawkins R
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Aug; 43(2):114. PubMed ID: 8708612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cytobrush quality assurance in endocervical smears].
    Kerl J; Ross A; Hilgarth M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jan; 51(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 2026300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The multispatula: a new dimension in sampling the cervix.
    Pistofides GA; House FR; Shepherd JM; Vale JC
    Lancet; 1984 Jun; 1(8388):1214-5. PubMed ID: 6144927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Papanicolaou smear and endocervical cell yield.
    Shadel RF
    J Fam Pract; 1988 Nov; 27(5):551. PubMed ID: 3193073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The false negative smear: an instrumental error?
    Rubio CA
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):500-1. PubMed ID: 269598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.