These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1494111)

  • 21. Vertical dimensional stability and rigidity of occlusal registration materials.
    Walker MP; Wu E; Heckman ME; Alderman N
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 19903644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical factors and clinical variation influencing the reproducibility of interocclusal recording methods.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
    Br Dent J; 2002 Apr; 192(7):395-400; discussion 391. PubMed ID: 12017459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship.
    Ockert-Eriksson G; Eriksson A; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11203625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
    DeLong R; Knorr S; Anderson GC; Hodges J; Pintado MR
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 17418474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of strain rate on the behavior of elastomeric impression.
    Klooster J; Logan GI; Tjan AH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 1800722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A study of the "thixotropic" property of elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai J; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 8003196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some parameters for testing deformation of elastomeric impression materials.
    Blomberg PA; Mahmood S; Smales RJ; Makinson OF
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Aug; 37(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 1444946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of eight elastomeric occlusal registration materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Dec; 143(12):1358-60. PubMed ID: 23204094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Compression Resistance of Different Interocclusal Recording Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Nagrath R; Lahori M; Kumar V; Gupta V
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Dec; 14(Suppl 1):76-85. PubMed ID: 26199495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative elasticity tests for elastomeric (non putty) impression materials.
    Blomberg PA; Mahmood S; Smales RJ; Makinson OF
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Oct; 37(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 1444955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An investigation of the rheological properties of 10 vinyl-polysiloxane impression materials.
    Chai J; Pang IC; Leong D; Kim JE; Torres P
    J Prosthodont; 1993 Sep; 2(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 8298720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of Four Elastomeric Interocclusal Recording Materials.
    Dua P; Gupta SH; Ramachandran S; Sandhu HS
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2007 Jul; 63(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 27408006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 13(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15032895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vivo investigation of seating and removal forces associated with recording impressions in dentate patients.
    Sotiriou M; Hobkirk JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 8809249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impression techniques: clinical properties that matter.
    Nash RW
    Dent Today; 2014 Apr; 33(4):110, 112-3. PubMed ID: 24791295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiographic Appearance of Interocclusal Record Materials for Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Implant Surgeries.
    Mohunta VV; McGlumphy EA; Kim DG; Azer SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 28494032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bond strengths between elastomeric impression materials and disinfected preliminary impressions.
    DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Bell LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Apr; 71(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8196006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A clinical evaluation of materials for interocclusal registration in centric relation.
    Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL; de Mattos MG; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11213793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.