These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1494281)

  • 1. Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1394-401. PubMed ID: 1494281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 37(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 8028325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS; Wilber LA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 2314073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
    George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms.
    Nabelek AK; Mason D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 7300279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural application of the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Snik AF; Beynon AJ; Mylanus EA; van der Pouw CT; Cremers CW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 Mar; 107(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 9525238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related changes in consonant and sentence processing.
    Woods DL; Doss Z; Herron TJ; Yund EW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(8):1277-91. PubMed ID: 23341320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56. PubMed ID: 18367695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vowel boundaries for steady-state and linear formant trajectories.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Crowley HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):675-87. PubMed ID: 8370873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cues for perception of the diphthong /aI/ in either noise or reverberation. Part I. Duration of the transition.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Crowley H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2681-93. PubMed ID: 8207141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of interaural speech-recognition differences on binaural advantage for speech in noise.
    McCullough JA; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Jul; 3(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 1421457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients.
    Iwaki T; Matsushiro N; Mah SR; Sato T; Yasuoka E; Yamamoto K; Kubo T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15224853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids.
    Carter AS; Noe CM; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 11392438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aging and consonant errors in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS; Huntley RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1786-96. PubMed ID: 1960274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise.
    Johnson CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 43(1):144-57. PubMed ID: 10668658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.