These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14946280)

  • 1. The semantic validity of TAT interpretations.
    DAVENPORT BF
    J Consult Psychol; 1952 Jun; 16(3):71-5. PubMed ID: 14946280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A COMPARISON OF SET "A" OF THE HOLTZMAN INKBLOTS WITH THE RORSCHACH BY MEANS OF THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL.
    OTTEN MW; VAN DECASTLER
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1963 Dec; 27():452-60. PubMed ID: 14083253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL INVESTIGATION OF COLOR ON THE HOLTZMAN.
    VANDECASTLE RL; SPICHER RS
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Dec; 28():491-8. PubMed ID: 14242372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing diagnostic validity of the TAT and a new picture projective test.
    Sharkey KJ; Ritzler BA
    J Pers Assess; 1985 Aug; 49(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 3900331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The validity of thematic projective technique interpretations.
    LITTLE KB; SHNEIDMAN ES
    J Pers; 1955 Mar; 23(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 14354599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity of projective interpretations of art products of mentally retarded individuals.
    POPPLESTONE JA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1954 Oct; 59(2):263-5. PubMed ID: 13197440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The levels hypothesis and the study of stimulus value of projective test items.
    Weiss JH; Goldfried MR; Bayroff I
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1965 Dec; 29(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 5320715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of projective assessment techniques in pediatric research.
    Poster EC
    J Pediatr Nurs; 1989 Feb; 4(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 2646424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) "The scientific status of projective techniques".
    Hibbard S
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 12763700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SENTENCE COMPLETION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTELLECTUALLY SUPERIOR BOYS AND GIRLS.
    SMITH RM
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1963 Dec; 27():472-80. PubMed ID: 14083255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A scoring scheme for the TAT and other verbal projective techniques.
    FINE R
    J Proj Tech; 1955 Sep; 19(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 13243387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Value and limitations of the legal application of projective techniques, with special reference to the TAT].
    CANEPA G
    Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1951 Oct; 12(4-5):405-26. PubMed ID: 14878549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manual for a scoring scheme for verbal projective techniques (TAT, MAPS, stories and the like).
    FINE R
    J Proj Tech; 1955 Sep; 19(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 13243388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The symbolization of logical relationships in a line-drawing medium.
    Denner B
    J Gen Psychol; 1967 Oct; 77(2d Half):211-6. PubMed ID: 4168466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability of responses and the stability of scores and interpretations of projective protocols.
    FISKE DW
    J Proj Tech; 1959 Sep; 23():263-7. PubMed ID: 13823280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques.
    Lilienfeld SO; Wood JM; Garb HN
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2000 Nov; 1(2):27-66. PubMed ID: 26151980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. TAT newsletter.
    J Proj Tech; 1952 Jun; 16(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 14939220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TAT bibliography: supplement for 1951.
    J Proj Tech; 1952 Mar; 16(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 14918182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TAT newsletter.
    J Proj Tech; 1951 Dec; 15(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 14881105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative study of the Rorschach and TAT given to 33 psychoneurotics].
    REDA GC; FRIGHI L; SCHIAVI E
    Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1951 Oct; 12(4-5):368-83. PubMed ID: 14878545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.