These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1494665)
1. Plastic cup on i.v. site: nurse-expert testimony. Case in point: Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical Center (596 N.E. 2d 1110-OH [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Dec; 33(7):4. PubMed ID: 1494665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Injection technique: R.N. expert opinion. Case in point: Tripp v. Humana, Inc. (474 So. 2d 88 - AL). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Oct; 26(5):2. PubMed ID: 3852349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' word v. nurse's word: documentation. Case in point: Sheppard v. Kimbrough (318 S.E. 2d - SC). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Nov; 25(6):4. PubMed ID: 6568727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurse "log rolls" solo: adverse effects. Case in point: Routh v. St. John's Mercy Med. Center (785 S.W. 2d 744--MO (1990)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jul; 31(2):4. PubMed ID: 2377732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The nurse as an expert witness. Creighton H Nurs Manage; 1988 Aug; 19(8):22-3. PubMed ID: 3399203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Failure to timely report test results: cause of stillbirth? Case in point: Clancy v. Euclid General Hospital (584 N.E. 2d 763--OH (1989)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Mar; 32(10):2. PubMed ID: 1594770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nurse-expert fails to 'go to bat' in testifying for plaintiffs. Case on point: Ross v. Redding Medical Center, 2003 WL 21246105-CA. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Jun; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 12886709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. OH: aged agitated pt. with dementia falls: expert testimony-no deviation from standards. Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Jan; 39(8):3. PubMed ID: 10086009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Poor nursing practice": expert opinions. Case in point: Breit v. St. Luke's Memorial Hosp. (743 P. 2d 1254--WA). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Dec; 28(7):4. PubMed ID: 3423266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Must nurse expert have recent hands-on experience? Case on point: Baptist Medical Center of Beaches, Inc. v. Rhodin, 1D10-859 (7/16/2010)-FL. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Sep; 51(4):4. PubMed ID: 20954519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Was there sufficient nurse expert testimony to go to a jury? Case on point: Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 2004 WL 2222384 -CA. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Oct; 45(5):2. PubMed ID: 15559717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nurse-expert's testimony held admissible. Case in point: Wickliffe v. Sunrise Hosp., Inc. (766 P. 2d 1322--NV (1988)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):2. PubMed ID: 2704834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurse and the law. Expert evidence. Langslow A Aust Nurses J; 1989 Nov; 19(5):30-1. PubMed ID: 2590089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pt. slips & breaks hip on "leakage": expert testimony. Case in point: McMillan v. King (577 So. 2d 519-MS (1990)). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 May; 30(12):2. PubMed ID: 2356315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Chaos in the O.R. - CNRA: "Res Ipsa" doctrine. Case in point. Morgan v. Children's Hospital (480 N.E. 2d 464 - OH). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Sep; 26(4):4. PubMed ID: 3851478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. KY: unlicensed nurse expert's testimony excluded: selecting 'wrong expert' can be fatal to case. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Apr; 43(11):3. PubMed ID: 12764979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forewarned is forearmed. Coombes R Nurs Times; 1999 Sep 8-14; 95(36):12-3. PubMed ID: 10661238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. GA: is alleged negligence same as malpractice?: is expert medical testimony needed for negligence? Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Feb; 44(9):3. PubMed ID: 15038329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]