These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

39 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1494694)

  • 1. [Experimental study of primary fixation of screw-ring acetabular components. Role of initial screw-cutting].
    Favard L; Bonnard C; Burdin P; Rosset P; Bertrand P; Queguiner A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1992; 78(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 1494694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strength of initial mechanical fixation of screw ring acetabular components.
    Kody MH; Kabo JM; Markolf KL; Dorey FJ; Amstutz HC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Aug; (257):146-53. PubMed ID: 2379353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of screw eccentricity on the initial stability of the acetabular cup.
    Hsu JT; Chang CH; An KN; Zobitz ME; Phimolsarnti R; Hugate RR; Lai KA
    Int Orthop; 2007 Aug; 31(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 16947050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Anatomic study of internal fixation of acetabular anterior column plate technique].
    Wang XQ; Zhang W; Sun S; Zhang JL; Wang J; Li W
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 44(24):1700-3. PubMed ID: 17359720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of screw eccentricity on the initial stability of the acetabular cup in artificial foam bone of different qualities.
    Hsu JT; Lin DJ
    Artif Organs; 2010 Jan; 34(1):E10-6. PubMed ID: 19995362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixed-angle screws vs standard screws in acetabular prosthesis fixation: a cadaveric biomechanical study.
    Hugate RR; Dickey ID; Chen Q; Wood CM; Sim FH; Rock MG
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):806-14. PubMed ID: 18639433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of initial surface apposition in porous-coated acetabular components.
    Schwartz JT; Engh CA; Forte MR; Kukita Y; Grandia SK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Aug; (293):174-87. PubMed ID: 8339478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of transverse acetabular fracture fixation.
    Shazar N; Brumback RJ; Novak VP; Belkoff SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jul; (352):215-22. PubMed ID: 9678050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial stability of porous coated acetabular implants. The effect of screw placement, screw tightness, defect type, and oversize implants.
    Hadjari MH; Hollis JM; Hofmann OE; Flahiff CM; Nelson CL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Oct; (307):117-23. PubMed ID: 7924023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relation between micromotion and screw fixation in acetabular cup.
    Hsu JT; Lai KA; Chen Q; Zobitz ME; Huang HL; An KN; Chang CH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Oct; 84(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 16971018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [An anatomic study of lag screw placement in anterior column of acetabulum and design of targeting device].
    Hong H; Pan Z; Chen H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 20(6):651-4. PubMed ID: 16827393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Long-term results of primary hip total prosthesis with acetabulum reinforcement ring].
    Aebi M; Richner L; Ganz R
    Orthopade; 1989 Nov; 18(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 2608270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fine thread versus coarse thread. A comparison of the maximum holding power.
    Gausepohl T; Möhring R; Pennig D; Koebke J
    Injury; 2001 Dec; 32 Suppl 4():SD1-7. PubMed ID: 11812471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ingrowth reduces implant-to-bone relative displacements in canine acetabular prostheses.
    Heiner JP; Manley P; Kohles S; Ulm M; Bogart L; Vanderby R
    J Orthop Res; 1994 Sep; 12(5):657-64. PubMed ID: 7931782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].
    Simko P; Braunsteiner T; Vajcziková S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Aug; 73(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 17026887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results of cemented and screwed acetabular components.
    Agrifoglio E; Federici A; Sanguineti F; Maxena S; Giacchè P
    Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1993; 19(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 8567260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impingement contributes to backside wear and screw-metallic shell fretting in modular acetabular cups.
    Kligman M; Furman BD; Padgett DE; Wright TM
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):258-64. PubMed ID: 17275644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safe screw placement in acetabular revision surgery.
    Meldrum R; Johansen RL
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8):953-60. PubMed ID: 11740748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Application of acetabulum reinforcement ring for reconstructing acetabular defects in artificial hip replacement].
    Han W; Zhang H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 23(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 19275103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cementing acetabular sockets into metal-backed acetabular components and antiprotrusio cages: a technical tip.
    Ezzet KA
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4):609-11. PubMed ID: 17562422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.