BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1494803)

  • 1. The effect of cytological screening on cervical neoplasia in the Italian province of Varese.
    Gatta G; Bottini GM; Lampertico P; Sant M; Lualdi M; Berrino F
    Tumori; 1992 Oct; 78(5):295-9. PubMed ID: 1494803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cytologic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Sweden evaluated by identification and simulation.
    Gustafsson L; Adami HO
    Br J Cancer; 1990 Jun; 61(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 2372495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of regular 3-yearly screening on the incidence of cervical smears: the Leiden experience.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ; Wijsman-Grootendorst A
    Cytopathology; 1990; 1(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 2101670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gynaecological cytology screening in South Australia: a 23-year experience.
    MacCormac L; Lew W; King G; Allen PW
    Med J Aust; 1988 Nov; 149(10):530-6. PubMed ID: 3185322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Duration of preclinical cervical cancer and reduction in incidence of invasive cancer following negative pap smears.
    van Oortmarssen GJ; Habbema JD
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 24(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 7635589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiency of organised and opportunistic cytological screening for cancer in situ of the cervix.
    Gustafsson L; Sparén P; Gustafsson M; Wilander E; Bergström R; Adami HO
    Br J Cancer; 1995 Aug; 72(2):498-505. PubMed ID: 7640239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cytological early detection of cervical carcinoma: possibilities and limitations. Analysis of failures.
    Möbius G
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1993; 119(9):513-21. PubMed ID: 8325903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal study of women with negative cervical smears according to endocervical status.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Lancet; 1991 Feb; 337(8736):265-7. PubMed ID: 1671112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [In situ and invasive cervical cancer epidemiology in the province of Girona, Spain 1990-2004: incidence, mortality, survival and screening history].
    Castro Marqueta P; Moreno-Crespi J; Buxó-Pujolràs M; Cervantes-Amat M; Pérez-Gómez B; Marcos-Gragera R
    Med Clin (Barc); 2011 Feb; 136(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 21051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of endocervical status on the cytologic prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 1449025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cytology screening history of women diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: a case-control study.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 15471249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Greenland.
    Nielsen NH; Jensen H
    APMIS; 1993 Apr; 101(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8323738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical cancer screening. Past success and future challenge.
    Dewar MA; Hall K; Perchalski J
    Prim Care; 1992 Sep; 19(3):589-606. PubMed ID: 1410065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effectiveness of cervical screening - expectation and reality].
    Kostova P; Zlatkov V
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2000; 39(3):23-4. PubMed ID: 11187989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of gynaecological abnormalities in pre-selection criteria for cervical screening: preliminary evaluation of 3602 subjects in south India.
    Sujathan K; Kannan S; Pillai KR; Mathew A; Joseph M; Symalakumari B; Nair MK
    Cytopathology; 1995 Apr; 6(2):75-87. PubMed ID: 7795168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Papanicolaou smears in Victoria: are the wrong women being screened?
    Mitchell H; Drake M; Medley G
    Med J Aust; 1987 Dec 7-21; 147(11-12):559-60. PubMed ID: 3696044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forty years of repeated screening: the significance of carcinoma in situ.
    Morrison BJ; Coldman AJ; Boyes DA; Anderson GH
    Br J Cancer; 1996 Sep; 74(5):814-9. PubMed ID: 8795587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experience in screening for cervical cancer in rural areas of Barsi Tehsil (Maharashtra).
    Nene BM; Jayant K; Malvi SG; Dale PS; Deshpande R
    Indian J Cancer; 1994 Mar; 31(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 8063335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cervical screening in Bulgaria. An analysis of the basic indices over the period 1970-1994].
    Kostova P; Zlatkov V; Danon S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1998; 37(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 9770794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of cytologic mass screening in the Federal Republic of Germany.
    Soost HJ; Bockmühl B; Zock H
    Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 6957096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.