BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1495302)

  • 1. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses.
    Lam TC; Fok M; Cheng SW; Wong J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Aug; 104(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 1495302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
    Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
    Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional and menometric study of side-to-side stapled anastomosis and traditional hand-sewn anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy.
    Deng B; Wang RW; Jiang YG; Tan QY; Zhao YP; Zhou JH; Liao XL; Ma Z
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18848461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
    Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
    Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?
    Ercan S; Rice TW; Murthy SC; Rybicki LA; Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 15746747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses.
    Blewett CJ; Miller JD; Young JE; Bennett WF; Urschel JD
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 7(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 11371275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Standard oesophagectomy and anastomotic technique.
    Fok M; Wong J
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1995; 84(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 7574378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.
    Takeyoshi I; Ohwada S; Ogawa T; Kawashima Y; Ohya T; Kawate S; Arai K; Nakasone Y; Morishita Y
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(34):1026-9. PubMed ID: 11020870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stapled anastomosis in esophageal resections with Chinese staplers: a retrospective study of 1965 consecutive cases.
    Sun Y; Ding B; Zhou N
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1998 Oct; 111(10):867-9. PubMed ID: 11189227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Esophageal anastomosis--based on the experience with 1460 operations].
    Vörös A; Ender F; Jakkel T; Cserepes E; Tóta J; Szántó I; Ereifej S; Seli A; Farsang Z; Kesserú B; László S; Polányi C
    Magy Seb; 2001 Jun; 54(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 11432162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
    Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients.
    Law S; Suen DT; Wong KH; Kwok KF; Wong J
    Arch Surg; 2005 Jan; 140(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15655203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Law S; Fok M; Chu KM; Wong J
    Ann Surg; 1997 Aug; 226(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 9296510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy for carcinoma.
    Chasseray VM; Kiroff GK; Buard JL; Launois B
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Jul; 169(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 2740970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anastomotic complications associated with stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis.
    Worrell S; Mumtaz S; Tsuboi K; Lee TH; Mittal SK
    J Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 161(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19922950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer].
    Francioni F; Anile M; Venuta F; De Giacomo T; Andreetti C; Diso D; Di Stasio M; D'Ecclesia G; Liparulo V; Coloni GF
    Minerva Chir; 2006 Apr; 61(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 16871138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial.
    Laterza E; de' Manzoni G; Veraldi GF; Guglielmi A; Tedesco P; Cordiano C
    Eur J Surg; 1999 Nov; 165(11):1051-4. PubMed ID: 10595609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mucosal tube technique for creation of esophageal anastomosis after esophagectomy.
    Maciver RH; Sundaresan S; DeHoyos AL; Sisco M; Blum MG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1703-7. PubMed ID: 19463582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.