240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1495399)
1. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning.
Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1757-1775. PubMed ID: 32333106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.
Hu X; Liu Z; Li T; Luo L
Memory; 2016; 24(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 25686085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
Metcalfe J; Finn B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The testing effect as a function of explicit testing instructions and judgments of learning.
Jönsson FU; Hedner M; Olsson MJ
Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 22580409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The sensitivity of judgment-of-learning resolution to past test performance, new learning, and forgetting.
Ariel R; Dunlosky J
Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 21264621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
Illman NA; Morrison CM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.
Sikström S; Jönsson F
Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
Jang Y
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delayed judgments of learning cause both a decrease in absolute accuracy (calibration) and an increase in relative accuracy (resolution).
Van Overschelde JP; Nelson TO
Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1527-38. PubMed ID: 17263076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time?
Kelemen WL; Weaver CA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Nov; 23(6):1394-409. PubMed ID: 9372607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
Jang Y; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
