226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1495939)
1. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Bethesda System. A proposal for reporting abnormal cervical smears based on the reproducibility of cytopathologic diagnoses.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Erozan YS; Wacholder S; Kurman RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov; 116(11):1155-8. PubMed ID: 1444745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
Hall S; Lörincz A; Shah F; Sherman ME; Abbas F; Paull G; Kurman RJ; Shah KV
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 8812532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytologic findings in 13 cases.
Zhou C; Hayes MM; Clement PB; Thomson TA
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 9801202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
Kristensen GB; Skyggebjerg KD; Hølund B; Holm K; Hansen MK
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1994634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: the rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification.
Kurman RJ; Malkasian GD; Sedlis A; Solomon D
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):779-82. PubMed ID: 1849626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of the clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGCUS) detected on cervical cytology screening.
Kennedy AW; Salmieri SS; Wirth SL; Biscotti CV; Tuason LJ; Travarca MJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 8898161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervicovaginal cytology in uterine adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings.
Costa MJ; Kenny MB; Naib ZM
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 1994621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical smear histories of 585 women with biopsy-proven carcinoma in situ.
Bergeron C; Debaque H; Ayivi J; Amaizo S; Fagnani F
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1676-80. PubMed ID: 9390123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endocervical glandular atypia in Papanicolaou smears.
Goff BA; Atanasoff P; Brown E; Muntz HG; Bell DA; Rice LW
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jan; 79(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 1727566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases.
Krane JF; Granter SR; Trask CE; Hogan CL; Lee KR
Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11241260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
