These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14959506)

  • 1. Inhibition of response mode in task switching.
    Koch I; Gade M; Philipp AM
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 14959506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits.
    Lawo V; Philipp AM; Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22468851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():12-8. PubMed ID: 24486802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Mar; 62(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18473629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Component processes in task switching.
    Meiran N; Chorev Z; Sapir A
    Cogn Psychol; 2000 Nov; 41(3):211-53. PubMed ID: 11032657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Executive control in set switching: residual switch cost and task-set inhibition.
    Arbuthnott K; Frank J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 54(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 10721237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control and interference in task switching--a review.
    Kiesel A; Steinhauser M; Wendt M; Falkenstein M; Jost K; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Sep; 136(5):849-74. PubMed ID: 20804238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 20853997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm.
    Rubin O; Meiran N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1477-91. PubMed ID: 16393058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Switching of response modalities.
    Philipp AM; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Oct; 58(7):1325-38. PubMed ID: 16194961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal cue-target overlap is not essential for backward inhibition in task switching.
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2068-79. PubMed ID: 19225989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions.
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):434-46. PubMed ID: 20680886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of absolute and relative practice on n-2 repetition costs.
    Scheil J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():65-9. PubMed ID: 26745367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response-repetition effects in task switching - dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability.
    Koch I; Schuch S; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21296307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition in task switching: The reliability of the n - 2 repetition cost.
    Kowalczyk AW; Grange JA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2419-2433. PubMed ID: 27653668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can time-based decay explain temporal distinctiveness effects in task switching?
    Grange JA; Cross E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 25028178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of cue type on backward inhibition.
    Arbuthnott KD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):1030-42. PubMed ID: 16248749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic and intentional activation of task sets.
    Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1474-86. PubMed ID: 11713881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.