193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14959634)
1. Specialty hospital ban was premature. Studies would have shown whether those facilities help or harm healthcare.
Swartzmeyer S; Killoran CN
Mod Healthc; 2004 Jan; 34(2):21. PubMed ID: 14959634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Offering guidance. CMS clarifies exceptions to specialty hospital ban.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2004 Mar; 34(12):4. PubMed ID: 15069892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Specialty hospitals: how the new Medicare law affects them.
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2004 Jan; 97(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 14998065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Niche facilities hit. Moratorium raises new self-referral issues for docs.
Piotrowski J
Mod Healthc; 2003 Dec 22-29; 33(51):28-9. PubMed ID: 14723086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Give specialty hospitals the hook. Congress should ignore MedPAC and make the moratorium permanent.
Kahn C
Mod Healthc; 2005 Feb; 35(9):30. PubMed ID: 15771055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. After the moratorium. Battle over specialty hospitals shifts to Congress.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2005 Jun; 35(23):14. PubMed ID: 15977675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New federal legislation affects physician ownership of specialty hospitals.
J Ky Med Assoc; 2004 Jun; 102(6):243-5. PubMed ID: 15216721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding the physician-owned specialty hospital phenomenon: the confluence of DRG payment methodology and physician self-referral laws.
Strothkamp S
J Health Law; 2005; 38(4):673-93. PubMed ID: 16673634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The implications of reimbursement changes for specialty hospitals.
Zimmerman E
Healthc Financ Manage; 2006 Jul; 60(7):42-5. PubMed ID: 16869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Controlling interest. MedPAC supports extension of specialty hospital ban.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2005 Jan; 35(3):8-9, 14. PubMed ID: 15696657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What gain-sharing? Specialty hospitals in joint ventures with docs are cautious but undeterred by IRS warning.
Bellandi D; Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1999 Jul; 29(30):8-9. PubMed ID: 10539355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hanging in the balance. Industry awaits word on specialty hospital ban.
Zigmond J
Mod Healthc; 2006 Feb; 36(7):10. PubMed ID: 16515057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Specialty conflict. Lawmakers mull ban as CMS bows out.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2003 Jun; 33(25):12. PubMed ID: 12858720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. AHA pushes regulation for specialty hospitals.
Reilly P
Mod Healthc; 2002 Aug; 32(32):10-1. PubMed ID: 12224106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncertain diagnosis. Nervous investors unsure if rules affect facilities.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2004 Mar; 34(13):10-1. PubMed ID: 15077352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Permanent ban. Bill would block specialty hospitals.
Romano M; Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2005 May; 35(20):8-9. PubMed ID: 15926360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ban has fiscal repercussions.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2006 Mar; 36(10):17. PubMed ID: 16579427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The emergence of physician-owned specialty hospitals.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 15635118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conflict of interest: the Trojan horse of specialty hospital legislation.
Weinberg SL
Am Heart Hosp J; 2003; 1(2):118-9. PubMed ID: 15815130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
