These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14959969)

  • 1. Accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometer blood pressure recording compared with digital and mercury measurements in Brazil.
    Gill G; Ala L; Gurgel R; Cuevas L
    Trop Doct; 2004 Jan; 34(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 14959969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.
    Waugh JJ; Gupta M; Rushbrook J; Halligan A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 12488650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternatives to the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Buchanan S; Orris P; Karliner J
    J Public Health Policy; 2011 Feb; 32(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 21109765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Saxena Y; Saxena V; Gupta R
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.
    Shahbabu B; Dasgupta A; Sarkar K; Sahoo SK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):LC11-4. PubMed ID: 27134902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aneroid sphygmomanometers. An assessment of accuracy at a university hospital and clinics.
    Bailey RH; Knaus VL; Bauer JH
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Jul; 151(7):1409-12. PubMed ID: 2064493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Calibration and safety of sphygmomanometers in health centers of Murcia].
    Antón JJ; Menárguez JF; Alcántara PA; Díaz MJ; Sánchez MC
    Aten Primaria; 1992 Oct; 10(6):817-20. PubMed ID: 1457703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood pressure measurement in epidemiological studies: a comparative analysis of two methods. Data from the EPIC-Potsdam Study. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.
    Kroke A; Fleischhauer W; Mieke S; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Willich SN; Boeing H
    J Hypertens; 1998 Jun; 16(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 9663913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of the pressure scale of sphygmomanometers in clinical use within primary care.
    Coleman AJ; Steel SD; Ashworth M; Vowler SL; Shennan A
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 16077263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.
    Ma Y; Temprosa M; Fowler S; Prineas RJ; Montez MG; Brown-Friday J; Carrion-Petersen ML; Whittington T;
    Am J Hypertens; 2009 Mar; 22(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 19057514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Type and accuracy of sphygmomanometers in primary care: a cross-sectional observational study.
    A'Court C; Stevens R; Sanders S; Ward A; McManus R; Heneghan C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Sep; 61(590):e598-603. PubMed ID: 22152749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prevalence of hypertension among 18 years old and over adults in 2010-2012 in China: based on the value of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
    Zhao L; Yu D; Fu P; Yu W; Guo H; Yang X
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2018 Jan; 47(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29903215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of mercury and aneroid blood pressure measurements in youth.
    Shah AS; Dolan LM; D'Agostino RB; Standiford D; Davis C; Testaverde L; Pihoker C; Daniels SR; Urbina EM;
    Pediatrics; 2012 May; 129(5):e1205-10. PubMed ID: 22508914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative study on electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in the field study].
    Yu D; Li D; Guo Q; Yu W; Xu X; Zhao L
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Nov; 44(6):914-7. PubMed ID: 26738382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer?
    Pickering TG
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 12604932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditing the technology used to measure blood pressure.
    Amoore JN; Guehenec M; Scordecchia R; Scott DH
    J Med Eng Technol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 20121458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical assessment of blood pressure.
    McKay DW; Campbell NR; Parab LS; Chockalingam A; Fodor JG
    J Hum Hypertens; 1990 Dec; 4(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 2096205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference.
    de Gaudemaris R; Folsom AR; Prineas RJ; Luepker RV
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Feb; 121(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 4014120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.