253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14960680)
1. Factors influencing the longer-term survival of uncemented acetabular components used in total hip revisions.
Jones CP; Lachiewicz PF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Feb; 86(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 14960680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Whaley AL; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 83(9):1352-7. PubMed ID: 11568198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement.
Gaffey JL; Callaghan JJ; Pedersen DR; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Feb; 86(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 14960669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture.
Weber M; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Sep; 80(9):1295-305. PubMed ID: 9759814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients who have congenital dislocation, degenerative osteoarthrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis.
Sochart DH; Porter ML
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Nov; 79(11):1599-617. PubMed ID: 9384419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up.
Shinar AA; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Feb; 79(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 9052535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven-year results.
Archibeck MJ; Berger RA; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Gitelis S; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1666-73. PubMed ID: 11701789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using an Uncemented Deep Profile Jumbo Component: A Ten to Sixteen Year Follow-Up Study.
McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):496-499. PubMed ID: 28993083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision of a total hip arthroplasty with a Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component inserted without cement. A follow-up note on the results at five to twelve years.
Lachiewicz PF; Poon ED
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Jul; 80(7):980-4. PubMed ID: 9698002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fate of stable femoral components retained during isolated acetabular revision: a six-to-twelve-year follow-up study.
Moskal JT; Shen FH; Brown TE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Feb; 84(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 11861731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?
Hooper N; Sargeant H; Frampton C; Hooper G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3806-10. PubMed ID: 26373851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note.
Bal BS; Maurer T; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1703-6. PubMed ID: 10608381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
