These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14962087)

  • 1. Mail surveys can achieve high response rates in a dermatology patient population.
    Filip JC; Ming ME; Levy RM; Hoffstad OJ; Margolis DJ
    J Invest Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 122(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 14962087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top dermatologic conditions in patients of color: an analysis of nationally representative data.
    Davis SA; Narahari S; Feldman SR; Huang W; Pichardo-Geisinger RO; McMichael AJ
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2012 Apr; 11(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 22453583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of mailed vs. on-site emergency department patient satisfaction surveys.
    Yarris LM; Fu R; Duby R; Frakes B; Brooks H; Norton RL
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Dec; 47(6):702-9. PubMed ID: 25281169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An example of maximizing survey return rates. Methodological issues for health professionals.
    Gore-Felton C; Koopman C; Bridges E; Thoresen C; Spiegel D
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Jun; 25(2):152-68. PubMed ID: 12026750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
    Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidental lesions found in veterans referred to dermatology: the value of a dermatologic examination.
    Kingsley-Loso JL; Grey KR; Hanson JL; Raju SI; Parks PR; Bershow AL; Warshaw EM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 Apr; 72(4):651-5.e1. PubMed ID: 25619205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The knowledge, awareness, and practice patterns of dermatologists toward psychocutaneous disorders: results of a survey study.
    Jafferany M; Vander Stoep A; Dumitrescu A; Hornung RL
    Int J Dermatol; 2010 Jul; 49(7):784-9. PubMed ID: 20618498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey research in dermatology: guidelines for success.
    Asarch A; Chiu A; Kimball AB; Dellavalle RP
    Dermatol Clin; 2009 Apr; 27(2):121-31, vi. PubMed ID: 19254655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
    Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epidemiology and outcomes of dermatology in-patient consultations in a Midwestern U.S. university hospital.
    Davila M; Christenson LJ; Sontheimer RD
    Dermatol Online J; 2010 Feb; 16(2):12. PubMed ID: 20178708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Racial and ethnic variation in response to mailed and telephone surveys among women in a managed care population.
    Nelson KM; Geiger AM; Mangione CM
    Ethn Dis; 2004; 14(4):580-3. PubMed ID: 15724779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tone of postcards in increasing survey response rates.
    Price JH; Yingling F; Walsh E; Murnan J; Dake JA
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):444-8. PubMed ID: 15154170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. French people and skin diseases: results of a survey using a representative sample.
    Wolkenstein P; Grob JJ; Bastuji-Garin S; Ruszczynski S; Roujeau JC; Revuz J;
    Arch Dermatol; 2003 Dec; 139(12):1614-9; discussion 1619. PubMed ID: 14676080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Day-care hospitalisation in the dermatology departments of French university hospitals].
    Bruneu Y; Bastuji-Garin S; Dupin N; Richard MA;
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Nov; 139(11):710-6. PubMed ID: 23199766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin conditions in primary care: an analysis of referral demand.
    Castillo-Arenas E; Garrido V; Serrano-Ortega S
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2014 Apr; 105(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 24657024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Certified mail fails to reach an Emergency Department population.
    Thompson JR; Stephens S; Summers RL
    J Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 27(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 15498611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A dermoscopy survey to assess who is using it and why it is or is not being used.
    Noor O; Nanda A; Rao BK
    Int J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 48(9):951-2. PubMed ID: 19702978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utilization of physician services for dermatologic complaints. The United States, 1974.
    Stern RS; Johnson ML; DeLozier J
    Arch Dermatol; 1977 Aug; 113(8):1062-6. PubMed ID: 142448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surveying physicians: do components of the "Total Design Approach" to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians?
    Field TS; Cadoret CA; Brown ML; Ford M; Greene SM; Hill D; Hornbrook MC; Meenan RT; White MJ; Zapka JM
    Med Care; 2002 Jul; 40(7):596-605. PubMed ID: 12142775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.