226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14962397)
1. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm.
Miyake A; Emerson MJ; Padilla F; Ahn JC
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004; 115(2-3):123-42. PubMed ID: 14962397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential effects of articulatory suppression on cue-switch and task-switch trials in random task cueing with 2:1 mapping.
Saeki E; Saito S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1599-614. PubMed ID: 22506894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of response-stimulus interval manipulation and articulatory suppression on task switching.
Saeki E; Saito S; Kawaguchi J
Memory; 2006 Nov; 14(8):965-76. PubMed ID: 17077031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Setting goals to switch between tasks: effect of cue transparency on children's cognitive flexibility.
Chevalier N; Blaye A
Dev Psychol; 2009 May; 45(3):782-97. PubMed ID: 19413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural mechanisms of advance preparation in task switching.
Gruber O; Karch S; Schlueter EK; Falkai P; Goschke T
Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):887-95. PubMed ID: 16490365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of articulatory suppression on task-switching performance: implications for models of working memory.
Saeki E; Saito S
Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 15279431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
Larsen JD; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: the role of mediator retrieval.
Logan GD; Schneider DW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):347-63. PubMed ID: 16569151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The roles of private speech and inner speech in planning during middle childhood: evidence from a dual task paradigm.
Lidstone JS; Meins E; Fernyhough C
J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Dec; 107(4):438-51. PubMed ID: 20633894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of top-down control during mental fatigue.
Lorist MM
Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1232():113-23. PubMed ID: 18687317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Verbal self-instructions in task switching: a compensatory tool for action-control deficits in childhood and old age?
Kray J; Eber J; Karbach J
Dev Sci; 2008 Mar; 11(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 18333979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
Schneider DW; Logan GD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
Monsell S; Mizon GA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory.
Hauer BJ; MacLeod CM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 16458848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural correlates of cue retrieval, task set reconfiguration, and rule mapping in the explicit cue task switching paradigm.
Travers S; West R
Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):588-601. PubMed ID: 18282198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.
Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J; Meyer P; Düzel E
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
Altmann EM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mixed pro and antisaccade performance in children and adults.
Irving EL; Tajik-Parvinchi DJ; Lillakas L; González EG; Steinbach MJ
Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():67-74. PubMed ID: 19103183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
