680 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14962417)
1. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Brown SM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):512; author reply 512-3. PubMed ID: 15364255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and the electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in amblyopic children aged 5 to 11 years.
Birch EE; Strauber SF; Beck RW; Holmes JM;
J AAPOS; 2009 Feb; 13(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 18848480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of recognition and grating acuities in very-low-birth-weight children with and without retinal residua of retinopathy of prematurity. Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group.
Dobson V; Quinn GE; Tung B; Palmer EA; Reynolds JD
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Mar; 36(3):692-702. PubMed ID: 7890499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age.
Chen SI; Chandna A; Norcia AM; Pettet M; Stone D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):614-9. PubMed ID: 16431958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver agreement for grating acuity and letter acuity assessment in 1- to 5.5-year-olds with severe retinopathy of prematurity.
Harvey EM; Dobson V; Tung B; Quinn GE; Hardy RJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Jun; 40(7):1565-76. PubMed ID: 10359339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in a population-based sample of 6-year-old Australian children.
Robaei D; Rose K; Ojaimi E; Kifley A; Huynh S; Mitchell P
Ophthalmology; 2005 Jul; 112(7):1275-82. PubMed ID: 15921756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.
Schmidt P; Maguire M; Dobson V; Quinn G; Ciner E; Cyert L; Kulp MT; Moore B; Orel-Bixler D; Redford M; Ying GS;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Apr; 111(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 15051194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
Becker R; Gräf M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
Elliott MC; Firth AY
Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children?
Howard C; Firth AY
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 16909076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Visual Acuity Results Between ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS Testing Methods in Children With Optic Pathway Gliomas.
Avery RA; Go C; Fisher MJ; Liu GT; Garcia A; Richter M; McGeehan B; Quinn GE; Ying GS
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 11(3):10. PubMed ID: 35262649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia with spectacles or in combination with translucent Bangerter filters.
Agervi P; Kugelberg U; Kugelberg M; Simonsson G; Fornander M; Zetterström C
Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1475-80. PubMed ID: 19500854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity in children during their periods of visual development.
Li L; Su Y; Chen CZ; Feng C; Zheng HM; Xing YQ
Ophthalmologica; 2011; 226(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21811053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Normative visual acuity in infants and preschool-aged children in Sydney.
Leone JF; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Rose KA;
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 92(7):e521-9. PubMed ID: 24606232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual acuity testability and comparability in Australian preschool children: the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study.
Leone JF; Gole GA; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Pai AS; Rose KA
Eye (Lond); 2012 Jul; 26(7):925-32. PubMed ID: 22498798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.
Rosser DA; Murdoch IE; Fitzke FW; Laidlaw DA
Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 12928680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.
Beck RW; Moke PS; Turpin AH; Ferris FL; SanGiovanni JP; Johnson CA; Birch EE; Chandler DL; Cox TA; Blair RC; Kraker RT
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 12566024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
