167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14962612)
1. Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: comparison of three different contrast agents.
Li P; Armstrong WF; Miller DL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 14962612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: an in vivo dose response study of delivery mode, pressure amplitude and contrast dose.
Li P; Cao LQ; Dou CY; Armstrong WF; Miller D
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 29(9):1341-9. PubMed ID: 14553812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of agent delivery mode on cardiomyocyte injury induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats.
Miller DL; Dou C; Armstrong WF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1257-63. PubMed ID: 16176792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microvascular permeabilization and cardiomyocyte injury provoked by myocardial contrast echocardiography in a canine model.
Miller DL; Driscoll EM; Dou C; Armstrong WF; Lucchesi BR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Apr; 47(7):1464-8. PubMed ID: 16580537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of time and of vasoactive drugs on capillary leakage induced during myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Miller D; Li P; Armstrong WF
Echocardiography; 2004 Feb; 21(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 14961790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of contrast agent dose and ultrasound exposure on cardiomyocyte injury induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats.
Miller DL; Li P; Dou C; Gordon D; Edwards CA; Armstrong WF
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 16183929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging of microvascular leakage induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats.
Swanson SD; Dou C; Miller DL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 16735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histological characterization of microlesions induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Miller DL; Li P; Gordon D; Armstrong WF
Echocardiography; 2005 Jan; 22(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 15660683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evans blue staining of cardiomyocytes induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats: evidence for necrosis instead of apoptosis.
Miller DL; Li P; Dou C; Armstrong WF; Gordon D
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1988-96. PubMed ID: 17689176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arrhythmias in rat hearts exposed to pulsed ultrasound after intravenous injection of a contrast agent.
Zachary JF; Hartleben SA; Frizzell LA; O'Brien WD
J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1347-56; discussion 1343-45. PubMed ID: 12494976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety profile of ultrasound enhancing agents in echocardiography.
Kumar S; Purtell C; Peterson A; Gibbons P; Khan AM; Heitner SB
Echocardiography; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1041-1044. PubMed ID: 31038768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noninvasive vessel-selective perfusion imaging with intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Asanuma T; Fujihara T; Otani K; Miki A; Ishikura F; Beppu S
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2004 Jun; 17(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15163938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency Dependence of Petechial Hemorrhage and Cardiomyocyte Injury Induced during Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography.
Miller DL; Lu X; Fabiilli M; Fields K; Dou C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1929-41. PubMed ID: 27126240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does contrast echocardiography with Optison induce myocardial necrosis in humans?
Borges AC; Walde T; Reibis RK; Grohmann A; Ziebig R; Rutsch W; Schimke I; Baumann G
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2002 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1080-6. PubMed ID: 12373250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac arrhythmia and injury induced in rats by burst and pulsed mode ultrasound with a gas body contrast agent.
Miller DL; Dou C; Lucchesi BR
J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Nov; 28(11):1519-26. PubMed ID: 19854967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of ultrasound pulses combined with Definity for targeted blood-brain barrier disruption: a feasibility study.
McDannold N; Vykhodtseva N; Hynynen K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 33(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 17337109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Membrane damage thresholds for 1- to 10-MHz pulsed ultrasound exposure of phagocytic cells loaded with contrast agent gas bodies in vitro.
Miller DL; Dou C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 30(7):973-7. PubMed ID: 15313329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Microbubble Size and Pulse Amplitude on Hepatocyte Injury Induced by Contrast-Enhanced Diagnostic Ultrasound.
Miller DL; Lu X; Fabiilli M; Dou C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):170-176. PubMed ID: 30366606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent: results in 18,671 consecutive studies.
Kusnetzky LL; Khalid A; Khumri TM; Moe TG; Jones PG; Main ML
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Apr; 51(17):1704-6. PubMed ID: 18436124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound contrast agents: balancing safety versus efficacy.
Main ML; Goldman JH; Grayburn PA
Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2009 Jan; 8(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 19236217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
