These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14962613)

  • 1. Possible temperature effects computed for acoustic microscopy used for living cells.
    Kujawska T; Wójcik J; Filipczyński L
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 14962613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Obstetrical ultrasound: can the fetus hear the wave and feel the heat?].
    Abramowicz JS; Kremkau FW; Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 22700164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temperature elevations computed for three-layer and four-layer obstetrical tissue models in nonlinear and linear ultrasonic propagation cases.
    Wójcik J; Filipczyński L; Kujawska T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 25(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 10320315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of nonlinear ultrasound propagation on high intensity brain therapy.
    Pinton G; Aubry JF; Fink M; Tanter M
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1207-16. PubMed ID: 21520833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High frequency ultrasound tissue characterization and acoustic microscopy of intracellular changes.
    Brand S; Weiss EC; Lemor RM; Kolios MC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1396-407. PubMed ID: 18439747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic streaming: comparison of low-amplitude linear model with streaming velocities measured by 32-MHz Doppler.
    Nowicki A; Secomski W; Wójcik L
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(5):783-91. PubMed ID: 9253827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation.
    Younan Y; Deffieux T; Larrat B; Fink M; Tanter M; Aubry JF
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082902. PubMed ID: 23927357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical and numerical calculations of optimum design frequency for focused ultrasound therapy and acoustic radiation force.
    Ergün AS
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Oct; 51(7):786-94. PubMed ID: 21459399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite volume analysis of temperature effects induced by active MRI implants: 2. Defects on active MRI implants causing hot spots.
    Busch MH; Vollmann W; Grönemeyer DH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16729878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harmonic motion imaging for focused ultrasound (HMIFU): a fully integrated technique for sonication and monitoring of thermal ablation in tissues.
    Maleke C; Konofagou EE
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1773-93. PubMed ID: 18367802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design of a low power hybrid HIFU applicator for haemostasis based on acoustic propagation modelling.
    Martínez-Valdez R; Ramos Fernández A; Vera Hernandez A; Leija Salas L
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2016; 32(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 26708742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic nonlinear focal shift in amplitude modulated moderately focused acoustic beams.
    Jiménez N; Camarena F; González-Salido N
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Mar; 75():106-114. PubMed ID: 27939786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical analysis of thermal response of tissues subjected to high intensity focused ultrasound.
    Gupta P; Srivastava A
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2018; 35(1):419-434. PubMed ID: 30307345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring derived acoustic power of an ultrasound surgical device in the linear and nonlinear operating modes.
    Petosić A; Ivancević B; Svilar D
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Jun; 49(6-7):522-31. PubMed ID: 19217636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temperature effects in the focal region of acoustic microscope.
    Maev RG; Maslov KI
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1991; 38(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 18267571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear change of on-axis pressure and intensity maxima positions and its relation with the linear focal shift effect.
    Makov YN; Sánchez-Morcillo VJ; Camarena F; Espinosa V
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Dec; 48(8):678-86. PubMed ID: 18442837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temperature dependence of acoustic harmonics generated by nonlinear ultrasound wave propagation in water at various frequencies.
    Maraghechi B; Hasani MH; Kolios MC; Tavakkoli J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2475. PubMed ID: 27250143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast prediction of pulsed nonlinear acoustic fields from clinically relevant sources using time-averaged wave envelope approach: comparison of numerical simulations and experimental results.
    Wójcik J; Kujawska T; Nowicki A; Lewin PA
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Dec; 48(8):707-15. PubMed ID: 18474387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical analysis of ultrasound propagation and reflection intensity for biological acoustic impedance microscope.
    Gunawan AI; Hozumi N; Yoshida S; Saijo Y; Kobayashi K; Yamamoto S
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Aug; 61():79-87. PubMed ID: 25890637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microelastic imaging of bone.
    Raum K
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jul; 55(7):1417-31. PubMed ID: 18986931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.