These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14963806)

  • 1. [Intention-to-treat].
    Faller H
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Feb; 43(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 14963806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review finds variable use of the intention-to-treat principle in musculoskeletal randomized controlled trials with missing data.
    Joseph R; Sim J; Ogollah R; Lewis M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 25304501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of intention to treat in analysis of noninferiority studies.
    Wiens BL; Zhao W
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 17715258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the Intention-to-treat Principle in Randomized Controlled Trials.
    McCoy CE
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Oct; 18(6):1075-1078. PubMed ID: 29085540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of randomized controlled trials.
    Stanley K
    Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(13):1819-22. PubMed ID: 17404173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods for the analysis of binary outcome results in the presence of missing data.
    Delucchi KL
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1994 Jun; 62(3):569-75. PubMed ID: 8063983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intention-to-treat analysis and accounting for missing data in orthopaedic randomized clinical trials.
    Herman A; Botser IB; Tenenbaum S; Chechick A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Sep; 91(9):2137-43. PubMed ID: 19723990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.
    Abraha I; Cherubini A; Cozzolino F; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Rimland JM; Folletti I; Marchesi M; Germani A; Orso M; Eusebi P; Montedori A
    BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2445. PubMed ID: 26016488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward.
    Schulz KF; Grimes DA
    Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9308):781-5. PubMed ID: 11888606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intention to treat analysis: how frequently is it used in ENT randomised controlled trials?
    Achar P; Mitra I; Duvvi S; Kumar BN
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Feb; 35(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 20447170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drop-out rates of cancer patients participating in longitudinal RCTs.
    Mathibe LJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 17449332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons of methods for analysis of repeated binary responses with missing data.
    Frank Liu G; Zhan X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):371-92. PubMed ID: 21442514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in worldwide volume and methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials.
    Ahmed Ali U; van der Sluis PC; Issa Y; Habaga IA; Gooszen HG; Flum DR; Algra A; Besselink MG
    Ann Surg; 2013 Aug; 258(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 23774315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of bias in clinical trials.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):595-6. PubMed ID: 21967950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection bias in observational and experimental studies.
    Ellenberg JH
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):557-67. PubMed ID: 8023035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian sensitivity model for intention-to-treat analysis on binary outcomes with dropouts.
    Kaciroti NA; Schork MA; Raghunathan T; Julius S
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):572-85. PubMed ID: 19072769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for dropout bias using mixed-effects models.
    Mallinckrodt CH; Clark WS; David SR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 11459446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the effect of multiple imputation on incomplete longitudinal data with application to a randomized clinical study.
    Fong DY; Rai SN; Lam KS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1004-22. PubMed ID: 23957512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.