203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14963822)
1. No evidence for minority male mating advantage in wild type strains of Drosophila ananassae tested in multiple-choice experiments.
Som A; Singh BN
Genet Mol Res; 2002 Dec; 1(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 14963822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence for minority male mating success and minority female mating disadvantage in Drosophila ananassae.
Som A; Singh BN
Genet Mol Res; 2005 Mar; 4(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 15841431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex-ratio and mating propensity in Drosophila biarmipes.
Singh BN; Pandey MB
Indian J Exp Biol; 1994 Jul; 32(7):482-5. PubMed ID: 7959925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraspecific sexual isolation in Drosophila.
Singh BN; Chatterjee S
Indian J Exp Biol; 1992 Apr; 30(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 1459591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Behavioral genetics of Drosophila ananassae.
Singh SR; Singh BN
Genet Mol Res; 2003 Dec; 2(4):394-409. PubMed ID: 15011143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of temperature on behavioural isolation: a study with Drosophila ananassae populations.
Yadav S; Yadav AK
Indian J Exp Biol; 2012 May; 50(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 22803327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of mutation on mating propensity in Drosophila biarmipes.
Singh BN; Pandey MB
Indian J Exp Biol; 1993 Nov; 31(11):932-3. PubMed ID: 8112770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rare male mating advantage for inversion karyotype in Drosophila ananassae.
Som A; Singh BN
Behav Genet; 2004 May; 34(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 14990872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of chromosome arrangements on mate recognition system leading to behavioral isolation in Drosophila ananassae.
Nanda P; Singh BN
Genetica; 2011 Feb; 139(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 21234646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mating advantage of rare males in models of sexual selection.
O'Donald P
Nature; 1977 May; 267(5607):151-4. PubMed ID: 16073426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Body size, mating success and advantage of large flies in Drosophila bipectinata species complex.
Krishna MS; Hegde SN
Indian J Exp Biol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):1341-7. PubMed ID: 9567772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drosophila bipectinata species complex.
Singh S; Singh BN
Indian J Exp Biol; 2001 Sep; 39(9):835-44. PubMed ID: 11831362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disruptive selection for sternopleural bristle phenotypes in Drosophila ananassae.
Nanda P; Singh BN
Genome; 2011 Oct; 54(10):845-51. PubMed ID: 21970458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Symmetrical and asymmetrical sexual isolation among laboratory strains of Drosophila ananassae.
Singh BN; Chatterjee S
Can J Genet Cytol; 1985 Aug; 27(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 4027774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mating activity and fitness of a few wild type strains of Drosophila ananassae.
Singh SR; Singh BN
Indian J Exp Biol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 10641192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mating success of wild type and sepia mutants Drosophila melanogaster in different choice.
Stanić S; Pavković-Lucic S
Riv Biol; 2005; 98(3):513-24. PubMed ID: 16440285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data.
Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E
Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pattern of sexual isolation between parental races (Drosophila nasuta nasuta and D.n. albomicans) and the newly evolved races (Cytorace I and II).
Ramachandra NB; Ranganath HA
Indian J Exp Biol; 1994 Feb; 32(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 8045622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex-ratio distorter of Drosophila simulans reduces male productivity and sperm competition ability.
Atlan A; Joly D; Capillon C; Montchamp-Moreau C
J Evol Biol; 2004 Jul; 17(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 15271073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assortative mating in Drosophila adapted to a microsite ecological gradient.
Singh SR; Rashkovetsky E; Iliadi K; Nevo E; Korol A
Behav Genet; 2005 Nov; 35(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 16273320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
