These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14964200)

  • 1. The women of Roe v. Wade.
    Glendon MA
    Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Living with Roe v. Wade.
    McConnell ML
    Commentary; 1990 Nov; 90(5):34-8. PubMed ID: 11656047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR
    Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
    Stith R
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition.
    Manninen BA
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):33-46. PubMed ID: 21161841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
    Ching B
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
    Davis PC; Gilligan C
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Court is ignoring science.
    Foster DG
    Science; 2022 May; 376(6595):779. PubMed ID: 35575724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
    Morgan RG
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court?
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Mar; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12698761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The fragility of the US Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade].
    Merchant J
    Med Sci (Paris); 2006; 22(8-9):773-5. PubMed ID: 16962056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protection of RU-486 as contraception, emergency contraception and as an abortifacient under the law of contraception.
    Wyser-Pratte RC
    Oregon Law Rev; 2000; 79(4):1121-56. PubMed ID: 12452141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Roe v. Wade at twenty-nine: the future of abortion rights in the U.S. remains an open question.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():6-7. PubMed ID: 12436734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
    Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The partial death of abortion rights.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade.
    Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roe v. Wade and the euthanasia debate.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 9114604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.