These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14964323)

  • 1. Predicted gain and functional gain with transcranial routing of signal completely-in-the-canal hearing aids.
    Fagelson MA; Noe CM; Murnane OD; Blevins JS
    Am J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 12(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 14964323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone-conduction amplification with completely-in-the-canal hearing aids.
    Hayes DE; Chen JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Feb; 9(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 9493943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-situ Audiometry Compared to Conventional Audiometry for Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Jasper BS; Kjærbøl EF; Jordell DH; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241259704. PubMed ID: 38835268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
    Sardari S; Jafari Z; Haghani H; Talebi H
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.
    Bagatto M; Moodie S; Scollie S; Seewald R; Moodie S; Pumford J; Liu KP
    Trends Amplif; 2005; 9(4):199-226. PubMed ID: 16424946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy of matching target insertion gains with open-fit hearing aids.
    Aazh H; Moore BC; Prasher D
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 22846638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fully implantable hearing aids in patients with congenital auricular atresia.
    Siegert R; Mattheis S; Kasic J
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Feb; 117(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 17277630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing aid prescription rules using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G; Backelin L
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 6523039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction.
    Håkansson B; Tjellström A; Rosenhall U
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 6719012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A middle ear implant with a titanium canal wall prosthesis for a case of an open mastoid cavity.
    Deveze A; Rameh C; Sanjuan M; Lavieille JP; Magnan J
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Oct; 37(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 20167445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disturbance caused by varying propagation delay in non-occluding hearing aid fittings.
    Groth J; Søndergaard MB
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(10):594-9. PubMed ID: 15724524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open-fitting hearing aids: a comparative analysis between open behind-the-ear and open completely-in-the-canal instant-fit devices.
    Alberti G; Portelli D; Loteta S; Galletti C; D'Angelo M; Ciodaro F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39014251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
    Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary evidence of asymmetry in uncomfortable loudness levels after unilateral hearing aid experience: evidence of functional plasticity in the adult auditory system.
    Munro KJ; Trotter JH
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 45(12):684-8. PubMed ID: 17132556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane.
    Pedley AJ; Kitterick PT
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():104-111. PubMed ID: 28666702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gain and maximum output of two electromagnetic middle ear implants: are real ear measurements helpful?
    Snik A; Noten J; Cremers C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Mar; 15(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 15119465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-world performance of a reverse-horn vent.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Lau CC; Dinulescu N; Cortez R; Keogh P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):653-61. PubMed ID: 16515137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.