636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1496459)
1. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
Hung TW; Richardson AS
J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
Folkesson UH; Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW
Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation.
Andersson-Wenckert I; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice.
Cannon ML; Tylka JA; Sandrik J
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
Hickel R; Voss A
ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
