These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14965451)

  • 1. An approach to the development of hearing standards for hearing-critical jobs.
    Laroche C; Soli S; Giguère C; Lagacé J; Vaillancourt V; Fortin M
    Noise Health; 2003; 6(21):17-37. PubMed ID: 14965451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the Hearing in Noise Test.
    Giguère C; Laroche C; Soli SD; Vaillancourt V
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):319-28. PubMed ID: 18569104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Pathophysiology of auditory and speech perception].
    Dauman R
    Rev Prat; 2009 May; 59(5):625-9. PubMed ID: 19552199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):526-37. PubMed ID: 16957502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual's elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise.
    Houtgast T; Festen JM
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):287-95. PubMed ID: 18569101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occupationally-acquired noise-induced hearing loss: a senseless workplace hazard.
    Kurmis AP; Apps SA
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2007; 20(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 17638679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The burdens of age-related and occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the United States.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 18469718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based occupational hearing screening II: validation of a screening methodology using measures of functional hearing ability.
    Soli SD; Amano-Kusumoto A; Clavier O; Wilbur J; Casto K; Freed D; Laroche C; Vaillancourt V; Giguère C; Dreschler WA; Rhebergen KS
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):323-334. PubMed ID: 29668374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating auditory perception and communication demands required to carry out work tasks and complimentary hearing resources and skills for older workers with hearing loss.
    Jennings MB; Shaw L; Hodgins H; Kuchar DA; Bataghva LP
    Work; 2010; 35(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 20164629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.