53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14965599)
1. Tc 99m-Sestamibi scintimammography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast microcalcifications.
Marini C; Cilotti A; Traino AC; Bellina CR; Grosso M; Armillotta N; Volterrani D; Bartolozzi C
Breast; 2001 Aug; 10(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 14965599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography and X-ray mammography in the characterization of clusters of microcalcifications: a prospective long-term study.
Grosso M; Chiacchio S; Bianchi F; Traino C; Marini C; Cilotti A; Manca G; Volterrani D; Roncella M; Rampin L; Marzola MC; Rubello D; Mariani G
Anticancer Res; 2009 Oct; 29(10):4251-7. PubMed ID: 19846982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Cancer Imaging: Can Tc-99m Sestamibi Scintimammography Fit In?
Iraniha S; Khalkhali I; Cutrone JA; Diggles L; Klein SR
Medscape Womens Health; 1997 Apr; 2(4):2. PubMed ID: 9746689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and scintimammography in detection of primary breast cancer related size of the tumour.
Cwikła JB; Buscombe JR; Chaberek S; Holloway B; Parbhoo S; Hilson AJ
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2000; 3(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 14600905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R
Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast microcalcifications: mammography versus mammography-sonography combination.
Marini C; Traino C; Cilotti A; Roncella M; Campori G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(1-2):17-26. PubMed ID: 12700541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of the usefulness of combined mammography and scintimammography in suspected primary breast cancer using ROC curves.
Buscombe JR; Cwikla JB; Holloway B; Hilson AJ
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jan; 42(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11197976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of scintimammography and mammography in recurrent breast cancer. Evaluation of their accuracy using ROC curves.
Kolasińska AD; Buscombe JR; Cwikła JB; Holloway B; Parbhoo SP; Davidson T; Hilson AJ
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2001; 4(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 14600889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 99mTc-MIBI scintimammography as a complement of the mammography in patients with suspected breast cancer. A multicentre experience.
Prats E; Banzo J; Meroño E; Herranz R; Carril JM;
Breast; 2001 Apr; 10(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 14965569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification of breast microcalcifications: radiological-pathological correlation.
Sun Z; Liang HW; Xu HM
Chin Med J (Engl); 2005 Sep; 118(17):1429-35. PubMed ID: 16157045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a breast cancer computer aided diagnosis system.
Frigas A; Kapsimalakou S; Spyrou G; Koufopoulos K; Vassilaros S; Chatzimichael A; Mantas J; Ligomenides P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():631-6. PubMed ID: 17108587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tc-99m Sestamibi Scintimammography for the Evaluation of Breast Masses in Patients with Radiographically Dense Breasts.
Cutrone JA; Khalkhali I; Yospur LS; Diggles L; Weinberg I; Pong EM; Tolmos J; Vargas MP; Vargas HI
Breast J; 1999 Nov; 5(6):383-388. PubMed ID: 11348318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Core imprint cytology of screen-detected breast lesions is predictive of the histologic results.
Farshid G; Pieterse S
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 108(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 16634070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of (99m)Tc-sestamibi scintimammography for breast cancer diagnosis.
Moriguchi SM; DE Luca LA; Griva BL; Koga KH; DA Silva ET; DE Luca Vespoli H; Uemura G
Exp Ther Med; 2010 Jan; 1(1):205-209. PubMed ID: 23136616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
