These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14965599)
1. Tc 99m-Sestamibi scintimammography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast microcalcifications. Marini C; Cilotti A; Traino AC; Bellina CR; Grosso M; Armillotta N; Volterrani D; Bartolozzi C Breast; 2001 Aug; 10(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 14965599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI. Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography and X-ray mammography in the characterization of clusters of microcalcifications: a prospective long-term study. Grosso M; Chiacchio S; Bianchi F; Traino C; Marini C; Cilotti A; Manca G; Volterrani D; Roncella M; Rampin L; Marzola MC; Rubello D; Mariani G Anticancer Res; 2009 Oct; 29(10):4251-7. PubMed ID: 19846982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Cancer Imaging: Can Tc-99m Sestamibi Scintimammography Fit In? Iraniha S; Khalkhali I; Cutrone JA; Diggles L; Klein SR Medscape Womens Health; 1997 Apr; 2(4):2. PubMed ID: 9746689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and scintimammography in detection of primary breast cancer related size of the tumour. Cwikła JB; Buscombe JR; Chaberek S; Holloway B; Parbhoo S; Hilson AJ Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2000; 3(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 14600905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery. Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography. Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast microcalcifications: mammography versus mammography-sonography combination. Marini C; Traino C; Cilotti A; Roncella M; Campori G; Bartolozzi C Radiol Med; 2003; 105(1-2):17-26. PubMed ID: 12700541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of the usefulness of combined mammography and scintimammography in suspected primary breast cancer using ROC curves. Buscombe JR; Cwikla JB; Holloway B; Hilson AJ J Nucl Med; 2001 Jan; 42(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11197976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of scintimammography and mammography in recurrent breast cancer. Evaluation of their accuracy using ROC curves. Kolasińska AD; Buscombe JR; Cwikła JB; Holloway B; Parbhoo SP; Davidson T; Hilson AJ Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2001; 4(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 14600889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 99mTc-MIBI scintimammography as a complement of the mammography in patients with suspected breast cancer. A multicentre experience. Prats E; Banzo J; Meroño E; Herranz R; Carril JM; Breast; 2001 Apr; 10(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 14965569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting. Uematsu T; Kasami M Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification of breast microcalcifications: radiological-pathological correlation. Sun Z; Liang HW; Xu HM Chin Med J (Engl); 2005 Sep; 118(17):1429-35. PubMed ID: 16157045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a breast cancer computer aided diagnosis system. Frigas A; Kapsimalakou S; Spyrou G; Koufopoulos K; Vassilaros S; Chatzimichael A; Mantas J; Ligomenides P Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():631-6. PubMed ID: 17108587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tc-99m Sestamibi Scintimammography for the Evaluation of Breast Masses in Patients with Radiographically Dense Breasts. Cutrone JA; Khalkhali I; Yospur LS; Diggles L; Weinberg I; Pong EM; Tolmos J; Vargas MP; Vargas HI Breast J; 1999 Nov; 5(6):383-388. PubMed ID: 11348318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting. Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Core imprint cytology of screen-detected breast lesions is predictive of the histologic results. Farshid G; Pieterse S Cancer; 2006 Jun; 108(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 16634070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast. Gökalp G; Topal U Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of (99m)Tc-sestamibi scintimammography for breast cancer diagnosis. Moriguchi SM; DE Luca LA; Griva BL; Koga KH; DA Silva ET; DE Luca Vespoli H; Uemura G Exp Ther Med; 2010 Jan; 1(1):205-209. PubMed ID: 23136616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]