These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14966635)

  • 1. [The feasibility and reliability of Pancherz's analysis in evaluating the treatment effects of bite-jumping on skeletal class II malocclusion].
    Chen RJ; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Aug; 12(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 14966635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Pancherz's analysis in evaluating the treatment effects of headgear-activator on skeletal Class II divison 1 malocclusion].
    Zhang JM; Chen HY; Zhang L
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 25(6):557-60. PubMed ID: 18306625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
    Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Case report. John Lickteig. Skeletal Class II Division 1.
    Witzig JW
    Funct Orthod; 1985; 2(5):12-5. PubMed ID: 3865870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal effects in class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA)?
    Kinzinger G; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Nov; 66(6):469-90. PubMed ID: 16331547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Multidirectional orthopedic therapy in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Tenti FV
    Mondo Ortod; 1981; 6(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 6942221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II skeletal treatment- orthopedic repositioning with the supermarionator.
    Gonzalez B
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):25-9. PubMed ID: 21314085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
    Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Long-term results after activator treatment].
    Schadlbauer E
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1984; 16(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 6595228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The activator. Part 1. The construction bite and the revised T.C.O. fixator (author's transl)].
    Tsutsumi T; Tadokoro M; Kawaguchi K; Mitsuma M
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1981 Jul; 81(7):1173-80. PubMed ID: 6949293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. European Board of Orthodontics case report: severe skeletal discrepancy.
    Paduano S
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 19506749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Centrographic analysis of 1-phase versus 2-phase treatment for Class II malocclusion.
    Dolce C; Schader RE; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 16102404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The mechanical "action maker" (Activator) and its use in interceptive orthodontic therapy].
    Spyropoulos MN; Bitsanis EX
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1982; 36(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 6819500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Use of functional bite plate (the J.A. Cervera PFB) in the treatment of skeletal and dental open bite].
    Albanese S; Minervini G; Semeraro G; Veneziano R; Troiano A; Rossi C
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1982; 23(1):165-80. PubMed ID: 6963139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.