These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14967360)

  • 21. Federal work force. Can outsiders do better in managing NIH grants?
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5614):1823. PubMed ID: 12649448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.
    Bucy PC
    Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Urology peer review at the National Institutes of Health.
    Olsson CA; Kennedy WA
    J Urol; 1995 Nov; 154(5):1866-9. PubMed ID: 7563369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. NIH center grants--PHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Dec; 49(244):49115-7. PubMed ID: 10269293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The peer review process: how to prepare research grant applications to the NIH.
    Novello AC
    Miner Electrolyte Metab; 1985; 11(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 4047004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perspective: is NIH funding the "best science by the best scientists"? A critique of the NIH R01 research grant review policies.
    Costello LC
    Acad Med; 2010 May; 85(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 20520024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The National Institute of General Medical Sciences.
    Becker GJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):790-2. PubMed ID: 17411928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. National Institutes of Health grant awards for pain, nausea, and dyspnea research: an assessment of funding patterns in 2003.
    Bradshaw DH; Nakamura Y; Chapman CR
    J Pain; 2005 May; 6(5):277-93. PubMed ID: 15890630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NIH and the scientist--and a crisis of apathy.
    Waitzman MB
    Fed Proc; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1677-8. PubMed ID: 4827512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Science policy. The NIH budget in the "postdoubling" era.
    Korn D; Rich RR; Garrison HH; Golub SH; Hendrix MJ; Heinig SJ; Masters BS; Turman RJ
    Science; 2002 May; 296(5572):1401-2. PubMed ID: 12029114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. NIH panel to monitor peer review in action.
    Taylor R
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6531):438. PubMed ID: 7777040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
    Miller G; Couzin J
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5823):358-9. PubMed ID: 17446364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.
    Henley C
    Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A proposal for per capita distribution of research funds with administrative flexibility.
    Hirsch HR
    Fed Proc; 1984 Apr; 43(5):7a-8a. PubMed ID: 6705928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tracking publication outcomes of National Institutes of Health grants.
    Druss BG; Marcus SC
    Am J Med; 2005 Jun; 118(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 15922698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Counterpoint: Statistical analysis in NIH peer review--identifying innovation.
    Pederson T
    FASEB J; 2007 Feb; 21(2):309-10; discussion 311. PubMed ID: 17267384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. NIH needs a makeover.
    Dey SK
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.