163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14969021)
1. Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing.
Sanada H; Moriguchi T; Miyachi Y; Ohura T; Nakajo T; Tokunaga K; Fukui M; Sugama J; Kitagawa A
J Wound Care; 2004 Jan; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 14969021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DESIGN-R, an assessment instrument for pressure ulcers .
Zhong X; Nagase T; Huang L; Kaitani T; Iizaka S; Yamamoto Y; Kanazawa T; Sanada H
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Feb; 59(2):36-43. PubMed ID: 23388396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Pressure Sore Status Tool a few thousand assessments later.
Bates-Jensen BM
Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):65-73. PubMed ID: 9362584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool.
Bates-Jensen BM; Vredevoe DL; Brecht ML
Decubitus; 1992 Nov; 5(6):20-8. PubMed ID: 1489512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monitoring pressure ulcer healing in persons with disabilities.
Mullins M; Thomason SS; Legro M
Rehabil Nurs; 2005; 30(3):92-9. PubMed ID: 15912673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force.
Thomas DR; Rodeheaver GT; Bartolucci AA; Franz RA; Sussman C; Ferrell BA; Cuddigan J; Stotts NA; Maklebust J
Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):96-101. PubMed ID: 9362591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Existing tools: are they meeting the challenges of pressure ulcer healing?
Thomas DR
Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):86-90. PubMed ID: 9362588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressure ulcer grading.
Moore Z
Nurs Stand; 2005 Sep 7-13; 19(52):56-64; quiz 66. PubMed ID: 16163987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pressure ulcer healing: what is it? What influences it? How is it measured?
Xakellis GC; Frantz RA
Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):20-6. PubMed ID: 9362573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical wound assessment using DESIGN-R total score can predict pressure ulcer healing: pooled analysis from two multicenter cohort studies.
Sanada H; Iizaka S; Matsui Y; Furue M; Tachibana T; Nakayama T; Sugama J; Furuta K; Tachi M; Tokunaga K; Miyachi Y;
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 22092794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward an intelligent wound assessment system.
Bates-Jensen BM; McNees P
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Aug; 41(7A Suppl):80S-86S; discussion 87S. PubMed ID: 7669204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pressure ulcer PUSH score and traditional nursing assessment in nursing home residents: do they correlate?
George-Saintilus E; Tommasulo B; Cal CE; Hussain R; Mathew N; Dlugacz Y; Pekmezaris R; Wolf-Klein G
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2009 Feb; 10(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19187884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive validity of weekly monitoring of wound status using DESIGN-R score change for pressure ulcer healing: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Iizaka S; Sanada H; Matsui Y; Furue M; Tachibana T; Nakayama T; Sugama J; Furuta K; Tachi M; Tokunaga K; Miyachi Y;
Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 22747950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Classification of decubitus ulcers. An important evaluation tool for determining the severity of the lesion].
St-Cyr D
Perspect Infirm; 2013; 10(3):37-9. PubMed ID: 23705280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study.
Bates-Jensen BM; McCreath HE; Harputlu D; Patlan A
Wound Repair Regen; 2019 Jul; 27(4):386-395. PubMed ID: 30828890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of the DESIGN-R with an observational study: an absolute evaluation tool for monitoring pressure ulcer wound healing.
Matsui Y; Furue M; Sanada H; Tachibana T; Nakayama T; Sugama J; Furuta K; Tachi M; Tokunaga K; Miyachi Y
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 21539648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs.
Defloor T; Schoonhoven L
J Clin Nurs; 2004 Nov; 13(8):952-9. PubMed ID: 15533101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient, wound, and treatment characteristics associated with healing in pressure ulcers.
Kramer JD; Kearney M
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11061706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Wound Intelligence System: early issues and findings from multi-site tests.
Bates-Jensen B; McNees P
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1996; 42(10A Suppl):53S-61S. PubMed ID: 9397883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
