150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14969176)
1. Use of a liquid-based, thin-layer Pap test in a community hospital. Impact on cytology performance and productivity.
Sass MA
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14969176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct-to-vial experience with AutoCyte PREP in a small New England regional cytology practice.
Marino JF; Fremont-Smith M
J Reprod Med; 2001 Apr; 46(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 11354836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eliminating the diagnosis atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: impact on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou test.
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Singh V; Sehgal A; Mitra AB
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(6):783-7. PubMed ID: 15581162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology.
Studeman KD; Ioffe OB; Puszkiewicz J; Sauvegeot J; Henry MR
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 12920754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based preparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories.
Vassilakos P; Saurel J; Rondez R
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 9987452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unsatisfactory SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou tests: causes and significance.
Alsharif M; McKeon DM; Gulbahce HE; Savik K; Pambuccian SE
Cancer; 2009 Feb; 117(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 19347825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.
Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening.
Bentz JS
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov; 5(6):857-71. PubMed ID: 16255628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
Cox JT
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of continuous monitoring of cytologic-histologic correlation data on cervical cancer screening performance.
Raab SS; Jones BA; Souers R; Tworek JA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Jan; 132(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 18181668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-to-vial performance.
Tench W
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):912-6. PubMed ID: 11127103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
Hessling JJ; Raso DS; Schiffer B; Callicott J; Husain M; Taylor D
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glandular Cell Abnormalities on SurePath Preparations: A Retrospective Review with Cytology-Histology Correlations.
Fischer G; Cormier K
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(5-6):423-429. PubMed ID: 30244241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of the SurePath liquid-based Pap test in automated screening and in detection of HSIL.
Cengel KA; Day SJ; Davis-Devine S; Adams CL; Madison-Henness D; Hartman ME; Freund GG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Nov; 29(5):250-5. PubMed ID: 14595790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
