BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14969213)

  • 1. Use of stereolithographic models as diagnostic and restorative aids for predictable immediate loading of implants.
    Ganz SD
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):763-71; quiz 772. PubMed ID: 14969213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
    Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate loading of dental implants in the esthetic region using computer-guided implant treatment software and stereolithographic models for a patient with eating disorders.
    Galindo DF; Butura CC
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 23889736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization in multi-implant placement for immediate loading in edentulous arches using a modified surgical template and prototyping: a case report.
    Jayme SJ; Muglia VA; de Oliveira RR; Novaes AB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):759-62. PubMed ID: 18807575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept.
    Lal K; White GS; Morea DN; Wright RF
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16433652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application and success of two stereolithographic surgical guide systems for implant placement with immediate loading.
    Abboud M; Wahl G; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):634-43. PubMed ID: 22616058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-assisted implant surgery; a flapless surgical/immediate loaded approach with 1 year follow-up.
    Nikzad S; Azari A
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Dec; 4(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 18937258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flapless implant placement: a technique to eliminate the need for a removable interim prosthesis.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 18762035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional software for fabrication of a surgical template and final implant-supported restoration for a fully edentulous maxilla: a case report.
    Becker W; Doerr J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Nov; 26(11):802, 804-7. PubMed ID: 16300235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of a custom template for immediate loading with the definitive prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Marchack CB; Moy PK
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 31(12):925-9. PubMed ID: 14736045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study.
    van Steenberghe D; Glauser R; Blombäck U; Andersson M; Schutyser F; Pettersson A; Wendelhag I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S111-20. PubMed ID: 16137096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed complete-arch prostheses supported by 4 immediate-loaded implants in the completely edentulous maxilla using clinical computerized tomography data.
    Kimura K; Fukase Y; Makino M; Masaki C; Nakamoto T; Hosokawa R
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():96-105. PubMed ID: 21495797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactive imaging for implant planning.
    Van Steenberghe D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jun; 63(6):883-4; author reply 884. PubMed ID: 15944994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
    Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study.
    Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases.
    Sarment DP; Al-Shammari K; Kazor CE
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Jun; 23(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 12854779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant surgery using customized surgical templates: the Compu-Guide Surgical Template System. Interview.
    Klein M
    Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Jun; 13(6):41-6. PubMed ID: 12132387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guided surgery for implant therapy.
    Orentlicher G; Abboud M
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2011 May; 23(2):239-56, v-vi. PubMed ID: 21492799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.