These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14969456)

  • 21. Estimation of the size of an open population from capture-recapture data using weighted martingale methods.
    Huggins RM; Yip PS
    Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 11318191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimating population size for capture-recapture data when capture probabilities vary by time and individual animal.
    Chao A; Lee SM; Jeng SL
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):201-16. PubMed ID: 1581485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mark-recapture models with parameters constant in time.
    Jolly GM
    Biometrics; 1982 Jun; 38(2):301-21. PubMed ID: 7115864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An extension of the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model for continuous covariates with application to Microtus pennsylvanicus.
    Bonner SJ; Schwarz CJ
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):142-9. PubMed ID: 16542240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Importance of accounting for detection heterogeneity when estimating abundance: the case of French wolves.
    Cubaynes S; Pradel R; Choquet R; Duchamp C; Gaillard JM; Lebreton JD; Marboutin E; Miquel C; Reboulet AM; Poillot C; Taberlet P; Gimenez O
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):621-6. PubMed ID: 20105205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A unified likelihood-based approach for estimating population size in continuous-time capture-recapture experiments with frailty.
    Xi L; Yip PS; Watson R
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):228-36. PubMed ID: 17447949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modeling individual effects in the Cormack-Jolly-Seber model: a state-space formulation.
    Royle JA
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17725811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Test of Positive Association for Detecting Heterogeneity in Capture for Capture-Recapture Data.
    Jeyam A; McCrea RS; Bregnballe T; Frederiksen M; Pradel R
    J Agric Biol Environ Stat; 2018; 23(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 31983870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survival of bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, estimated from 1981-1998 photoidentification data.
    Zeh J; Poole D; Miller G; Koski W; Baraff L; Rugh D
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):832-40. PubMed ID: 12495137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Capture-recapture estimation using finite mixtures of arbitrary dimension.
    Arnold R; Hayakawa Y; Yip P
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):644-55. PubMed ID: 19522870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Estimating survival of thrushes: modeling capture-recapture probabilities].
    Burskiî OV
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2011; 72(3):163-82. PubMed ID: 21786660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Simple capture-recapture models permitting unequal catchability and variable sampling effort.
    Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):494-500. PubMed ID: 8068848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parameter redundancy in Jolly-Seber tag loss models.
    Cai W; Yurchak S; Cole DJ; Cowen LLE
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 11(3):1131-1149. PubMed ID: 33598119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Capture-recapture when time and behavioral response affect capture probabilities.
    Chao A; Chu W; Hsu CH
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 10877300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding the impact of correlation within pair-bonds on Cormack-Jolly-Seber models.
    Draghici AM; Challenger WO; Bonner SJ
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(11):5966-5984. PubMed ID: 34141196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Semiparametric regression in capture-recapture modeling.
    Gimenez O; Crainiceanu C; Barbraud C; Jenouvrier S; Morgan BJ
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):691-8. PubMed ID: 16984309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Population growth in snow geese: a modeling approach integrating demographic and survey information.
    Gauthier G; Besbeas P; Lebreton JD; Morgan BJ
    Ecology; 2007 Jun; 88(6):1420-9. PubMed ID: 17601135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Revisiting the effect of capture heterogeneity on survival estimates in capture-mark-recapture studies: does it matter?
    Abadi F; Botha A; Altwegg R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e62636. PubMed ID: 23646131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A need for speed in Bayesian population models: a practical guide to marginalizing and recovering discrete latent states.
    Yackulic CB; Dodrill M; Dzul M; Sanderlin JS; Reid JA
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Jul; 30(5):e02112. PubMed ID: 32112492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.