These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14969456)

  • 41. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A continuous time version and a generalization of a Markov-recapture model for trapping experiments.
    Alpizar-Jara R; Smith CE
    Math Biosci; 2008; 214(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 18556026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Complete tag loss in capture-recapture studies affects abundance estimates: An elephant seal case study.
    Malcolm-White E; McMahon CR; Cowen LLE
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 10(5):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 32184988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The use of mixed logit models to reflect heterogeneity in capture-recapture studies.
    Coull BA; Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):294-301. PubMed ID: 11318172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Applications and extensions of Chao's moment estimator for the size of a closed population.
    Rivest LP; Baillargeon S
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):999-1006. PubMed ID: 17425635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A Bayesian, combinatorial approach to capture-recapture.
    García-Pelayo R
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 16904143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Breeding return times and abundance in capture-recapture models.
    Pledger S; Baker E; Scribner K
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):991-1001. PubMed ID: 24152120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Relative effects of sample size, detection probability, and study duration on estimation in integrated population models.
    Ross BE; Weegman MD
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Dec; 32(8):e2686. PubMed ID: 35633274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Recapture heterogeneity in cliff swallows: increased exposure to mist nets leads to net avoidance.
    Roche EA; Brown CR; Brown MB; Lear KM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58092. PubMed ID: 23472138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Estimating the size of an open population using sparse capture-recapture data.
    Huggins R; Stoklosa J; Roach C; Yip P
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):280-288. PubMed ID: 28632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Using imputation and mixture model approaches to integrate multi-state capture-recapture models with assignment information.
    Wen Z; Pollock KH; Nichols JD; Waser PM; Cao W
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 24571715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mixture regression models for closed population capture-recapture data.
    Tounkara F; Rivest LP
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):721-30. PubMed ID: 25963047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A general class of recapture models based on the conditional capture probabilities.
    Farcomeni A
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 26355633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Maximum penalized likelihood estimation in semiparametric mark-recapture-recovery models.
    Michelot T; Langrock R; Kneib T; King R
    Biom J; 2016 Jan; 58(1):222-39. PubMed ID: 26289495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Simple estimation and test procedures in capture-mark-recapture mixed models.
    Lebreton JD; Choquet R; Gimenez O
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):494-503. PubMed ID: 22082155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Capture-recapture studies using radio telemetry with premature radio-tag failure.
    Cowen L; Schwarz CJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 16135016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A spatial open-population capture-recapture model.
    Efford MG; Schofield MR
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 31517386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. One-inflation and unobserved heterogeneity in population size estimation.
    Godwin RT
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 27658370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Incorporating capture heterogeneity in the estimation of autoregressive coefficients of animal population dynamics using capture-recapture data.
    Nicolau PG; Sørbye SH; Yoccoz NG
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):12710-12726. PubMed ID: 33304489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Capture-recapture, epidemiology, and list mismatches: several lists.
    Lee AJ; Seber GA; Holden JK; Huakau JT
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):707-13. PubMed ID: 11550918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.