176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14969492)
1. Estimation in capture-recapture models when covariates are subject to measurement errors.
Hwang WH; Huang SY
Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1113-22. PubMed ID: 14969492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation in closed capture-recapture models when covariates are missing at random.
Lee SM; Hwang WH; de Dieu Tapsoba J
Biometrics; 2016 Dec; 72(4):1294-1304. PubMed ID: 26909877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximum likelihood abundance estimation from capture-recapture data when covariates are missing at random.
Liu Y; Liu Y; Li P; Zhu L
Biometrics; 2021 Sep; 77(3):1050-1060. PubMed ID: 32672861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A semiparametric method for estimating population size for capture-recapture experiments with random covariates in continuous time.
Yip PS; Lin HZ; Xi L
Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1085-92. PubMed ID: 16401282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of population size based on additive hazards models for continuous-time recapture experiments.
Yip PS; Zhou Y; Lin DY; Fang XZ
Biometrics; 1999 Sep; 55(3):904-8. PubMed ID: 11315026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the size of an open population using sparse capture-recapture data.
Huggins R; Stoklosa J; Roach C; Yip P
Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):280-288. PubMed ID: 28632891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential measurement errors in zero-truncated regression models for count data.
Huang YH; Hwang WH; Chen FY
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1471-80. PubMed ID: 21466529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of finite population mean for a sensitive variable using dual auxiliary information in the presence of measurement errors.
Zahid E; Shabbir J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212111. PubMed ID: 30742674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating population size for a continuous time frailty model with covariates in a capture-recapture study.
Xu Y; Liu L; You N; Pan H; Yip P
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):917-21. PubMed ID: 17403102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Capture-recapture when time and behavioral response affect capture probabilities.
Chao A; Chu W; Hsu CH
Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 10877300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The minimum capture proportion for reliable estimation in capture-recapture models.
Xi L; Watson R; Yip PS
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):242-9. PubMed ID: 17680836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On comparison of mixture models for closed population capture-recapture studies.
Xuan Mao C; You N
Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):547-53. PubMed ID: 18510651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of the size of an open population from capture-recapture data using weighted martingale methods.
Huggins RM; Yip PS
Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 11318191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semiparametric empirical likelihood inference for abundance from one-inflated capture-recapture data.
Liu Y; Li P; Liu Y; Zhang R
Biom J; 2022 Aug; 64(6):1040-1055. PubMed ID: 35429047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjustment for missingness using auxiliary information in semiparametric regression.
Zeng D; Chen Q
Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19432773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ratio estimation with measurement error in the auxiliary variate.
Gregoire TG; Salas C
Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):590-8. PubMed ID: 18759838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regression-assisted deconvolution.
McIntyre J; Stefanski LA
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(14):1722-34. PubMed ID: 21284016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple estimation and test procedures in capture-mark-recapture mixed models.
Lebreton JD; Choquet R; Gimenez O
Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):494-503. PubMed ID: 22082155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On population size estimators in the Poisson mixture model.
Mao CX; Yang N; Zhong J
Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 23865502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robust best linear estimator for Cox regression with instrumental variables in whole cohort and surrogates with additive measurement error in calibration sample.
Wang CY; Song X
Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1465-1484. PubMed ID: 27546625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
