These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14971260)
1. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Wallace SS; Froum SJ Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review. Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Rees J; Karasoulos D; Felice P; Alissa R; Worthington H; Coulthard P Eur J Oral Implantol; 2010; 3(1):7-26. PubMed ID: 20467595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Esposito M; Felice P; Worthington HV Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 May; 2014(5):CD008397. PubMed ID: 24825543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomised controlled clinical trial. Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Leone M; Viola P; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 20467616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective study of implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal and moderate residual crestal bone: results after 1 to 5 years. Urban IA; Lozada JL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1203-12. PubMed ID: 21197499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Dental Implant Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Ridge: A Comprehensive Overview of Systematic Reviews. Ting M; Rice JG; Braid SM; Lee CYS; Suzuki JB Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):438-464. PubMed ID: 28520572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus. Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study. Barone A; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 20831372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Aghaloo TL; Moy PK Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():49-70. PubMed ID: 18437791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Lundgren S; Andersson S; Gualini F; Sennerby L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 15726851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. Hallman M; Hedin M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Mar; 60(3):277-84; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 11887139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Rees J; Karasoulos D; Felice P; Alissa R; Worthington HV; Coulthard P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Mar; (3):CD008397. PubMed ID: 20238367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning. Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Del Fabbro M; Rosano G; Taschieri S Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 19049518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of implant surface and grafting protocol on clinical outcomes of endosseous implants. Marchetti C; Pieri F; Trasarti S; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 17622006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Francetti L; Weinstein R Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Dec; 24(6):565-77. PubMed ID: 15626319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings. Cordioli G; Mazzocco C; Schepers E; Brugnolo E; Majzoub Z Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 11359485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Healing in smokers versus nonsmokers: survival rates for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement. Peleg M; Garg AK; Mazor Z Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 16955605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone augmentation versus 5-mm dental implants in posterior atrophic jaws. Four-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled clinical trial. Felice P; Checchi V; Pistilli R; Scarano A; Pellegrino G; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(4):267-81. PubMed ID: 20467603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]