4602 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14971260)
1. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
Wallace SS; Froum SJ
Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.
Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Rees J; Karasoulos D; Felice P; Alissa R; Worthington H; Coulthard P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2010; 3(1):7-26. PubMed ID: 20467595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus.
Esposito M; Felice P; Worthington HV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 May; 2014(5):CD008397. PubMed ID: 24825543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomised controlled clinical trial.
Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Leone M; Viola P; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 20467616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective study of implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal and moderate residual crestal bone: results after 1 to 5 years.
Urban IA; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1203-12. PubMed ID: 21197499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Dental Implant Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Ridge: A Comprehensive Overview of Systematic Reviews.
Ting M; Rice JG; Braid SM; Lee CYS; Suzuki JB
Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):438-464. PubMed ID: 28520572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study.
Barone A; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U
J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 20831372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?
Aghaloo TL; Moy PK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():49-70. PubMed ID: 18437791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
Lundgren S; Andersson S; Gualini F; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 15726851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone.
Hallman M; Hedin M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Mar; 60(3):277-84; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 11887139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus.
Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Rees J; Karasoulos D; Felice P; Alissa R; Worthington HV; Coulthard P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Mar; (3):CD008397. PubMed ID: 20238367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation.
Del Fabbro M; Rosano G; Taschieri S
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 19049518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of implant surface and grafting protocol on clinical outcomes of endosseous implants.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Trasarti S; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 17622006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome of implant therapy involving localised lateral alveolar ridge and/or sinus floor augmentation: a clinical and radiographic retrospective 1-year study.
Hansen EJ; Schou S; Harder F; Hjorting-Hansen E
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 22043469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus.
Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Francetti L; Weinstein R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Dec; 24(6):565-77. PubMed ID: 15626319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings.
Cordioli G; Mazzocco C; Schepers E; Brugnolo E; Majzoub Z
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 11359485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Healing in smokers versus nonsmokers: survival rates for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement.
Peleg M; Garg AK; Mazor Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 16955605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone augmentation versus 5-mm dental implants in posterior atrophic jaws. Four-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled clinical trial.
Felice P; Checchi V; Pistilli R; Scarano A; Pellegrino G; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(4):267-81. PubMed ID: 20467603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
