120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14971770)
1. Comparison between TG-51 and TRS-398: electron contamination effect on photon beam-quality specification.
Lopez Medina A; Teijeiro A; Salvador F; Medal D; Vazquez J; Salgado M; Carrion MC
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 49(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 14971770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental determination of kQ factors for cylindrical ionization chambers in 10 cm × 10 cm and 3 cm × 3 cm photon beams from 4 MV to 25 MV.
Krauss A; Kapsch RP
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4227-46. PubMed ID: 25017482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correcting for electron contamination at dose maximum in photon beams.
Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1999 Apr; 26(4):533-7. PubMed ID: 10227355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of the role of lead foil in flattening filter free beam reference dosimetry.
Gao S; Nelson C; Wang C; Kathriarachchi V; Choi M; Saxena R; Kendall R; Balter P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 24(4):e13960. PubMed ID: 36913192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental determination of the beam quality dependence factors, kQ, for ionization chambers used in photon and electron dosimetry.
Guerra AS; Laitano RF; Pimpinella M
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1177-90. PubMed ID: 7568376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing electron contamination for photon beam-quality specification.
Li XA; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 1994 Jun; 21(6):791-7. PubMed ID: 7935216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical Note: On the impact of the incident electron beam energy on the primary dose component of flattening filter free photon beams.
Kuess P; Georg D; Palmans H; Lechner W
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4507. PubMed ID: 27487867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the beam quality specification of high-energy photons for radiotherapy dosimetry.
Andreo P
Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):434-40. PubMed ID: 10757593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo-based investigations on the impact of removing the flattening filter on beam quality specifiers for photon beam dosimetry.
Czarnecki D; Poppe B; Zink K
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2569-2580. PubMed ID: 28369978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs.
Chibani O; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 12945965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
