These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14971770)

  • 21. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
    Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of characteristics of photon and electron beams generated by Philips/Elekta and Varian linear accelerators.
    Song H; Xiao Y; Galvin JM
    Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):960-6. PubMed ID: 12094991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Out-of-field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators.
    Cardenas CE; Nitsch PL; Kudchadker RJ; Howell RM; Kry SF
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 27455499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols].
    Zakaria GA; Schütte W
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14732959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Absorbed dose determination for high energy photon and electron beams at a PRIMUS linear accelerator using the documents DIN 6800-2 and TRS-398.
    Hartmann GH
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):241-50. PubMed ID: 14732953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experimental determination of beam quality conversion factors k(Q) in clinical photon beams using ferrous sulphate (Fricke) dosimetry.
    Palm A; Mattsson O
    Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2756-62. PubMed ID: 12512708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Absorbed dose beam quality correction factors kappaQ for the NE2571 chamber in a 5 MV and a 10 MV photon beam.
    Palmans H; Mondelaers W; Thierens H
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Mar; 44(3):647-63. PubMed ID: 10211800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. PENELOPE/PRIMO-calculated photon and electron spectra from clinical accelerators.
    Brualla L; Rodriguez M; Sempau J; Andreo P
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 14(1):6. PubMed ID: 30634994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigation of the use of external aluminium targets for portal imaging in a medical accelerator using Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation.
    Kim H; Kim B; Baek J; Oh Y; Yun S; Jang H
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170376. PubMed ID: 29338304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between the TRS-398 code of practice and the TG-51 dosimetry protocol for flattening filter free beams.
    Lye JE; Butler DJ; Oliver CP; Alves A; Lehmann J; Gibbons FP; Williams IM
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(14):N362-72. PubMed ID: 27366933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
    Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electron contamination in 8 and 18 MV photon beams.
    Zhu TC; Palta JR
    Med Phys; 1998 Jan; 25(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 9472821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ionization chamber dosimetry of small photon fields: a Monte Carlo study on stopping-power ratios for radiosurgery and IMRT beams.
    Sánchez-Doblado F; Andreo P; Capote R; Leal A; Perucha M; Arráns R; Núñez L; Mainegra E; Lagares JI; Carrasco E
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(14):2081-99. PubMed ID: 12894972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A dosimetric evaluation of the IAEA-AAPM TRS483 code of practice for dosimetry of small static fields used in conventional linac beams and comparison with IAEA TRS-398, AAPM TG51, and TG51 Addendum protocols.
    Huq MS; Hwang MS; Teo TP; Jang SY; Heron DE; Lalonde RJ
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30009526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.